“marginally significant”

However, it had marginally significant (at p < .05) effects on the random slope of political participation for perceived social support and loneliness, and these effects went in substantively opposite directions.

The relation of leader’s expressiveness with knowledge collection, which was marginally significant ( r = .14, p = .05) in the first place, turned to be nonsignificant with gender in the equation ( r = .13, p = .08).

In all statistical tests, p < 0.01 was considered highly significant, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and 0.05 < p < 0.1 was considered marginally significant. 3.

We additionally checked for marginally significant maternal TDT P -values ( P < 0.05) at the SNP closest to the centromere and telomere on both arms of metacentric chromosomes and the q arm of acrocentric chromosomes.

Also, there was a marginally significant interaction between the Type of Processing and the Type of Test Stimuli, F (1, 30) = 4.07, p = .05, η p 2 = .12.

In addition, TEHP showed a marginally significant relationship with TLs ( p = 0.05, TMFs = 0.519; Fig. 2 ) in this study, indicating that TEHP tends to biodilute in this food web.

There was, however, a marginally significant interaction between food and the number of rivals (X 2 = 3.96, p = 0.05).

Phytoplankton C:P ratios in ambient conditions (ambient nutrients, temperature and without grazers) were higher in the larger size fraction as compared to the smaller size fraction for the highest productivity system ( p < 0.05, Figure 4 a), and marginally significant for the lowest productivity system ( p = 0.05, Figure 4 a).

A trend towards higher eczema presentation was reported in Group B infants, but the difference was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

The main effect of identity strength was marginally significant [ F (4.467,31.266) = 3.651 P <0.05].

In the validation group, only the difference in smoking history between patients with wild-type EGFR and patients with EGFR mutation was statistically significant ( P = 0.008) while sex showed a marginally significant difference between the two groups ( P = 0.05) ( Table 3 ). 3.2.

When we centred the model at the minimum female body mass (21.682 mg.), clutch size and offspring body mass appeared to be unrelated (t 1,97 =0.44, p=0.66), but centring at the maximum body mass (131.236 mg) revealed a negative relationship between clutch size and offspring body mass, though the effect was marginally significant (t 1,97 =-1.98, p=0.05).

Although location was marginally significant for agglutination, post hoc test did not reveal any significant differences among locations (all t < 2.33, all P > 0.05).

With that said, when we look at the relationship between iconicity and modification within the different sign types, we find that the correlation between iconicity and modification holds for signs produced in neutral space ( r = .47, p = .02), for two‐handed signs ( r = .51, p = .01), and for nondirectional signs ( r = .89, p < .001), and is marginally significant for symmetrical signs ( r = .57, p = .05).

A marginally significant standardized regression coefficient of b = .362, t (28) = 2.05, p = .05, f = .388, indicated that there was an overall trend for an increase in performance during the memory training.

second half) ANOVA showed only a marginally significant main effect of Part [ F (1, 76) = 4.07, p = 0.05] but a significant Part × Piece interaction [ F (2, 76) = 3.53, p = 0.03].

Table 4 shows also marginally significant ( P > 0.05 but < 0.010) trends of higher Vitamin D intake in pregnancy and breastfeeding (85.4% vs. 72.6%, P = 0.087) and in the case of no previous history of Vitamin D deficiency (83.5% vs. 77.0%, P = 0.070).

However, gender stereotype endorsement (GSE; Model 2) was found to differentially predict the trait-state discrepancy based on gender as stated in Hypothesis 3: This discrepancy was positively predicted by GSE for girls (γ 120 = 0.21, p < 0.001), whereas for boys the effect of GSE was negative and marginally significant (γ 120 = −0.09, p = 0.05).

Stress symptoms were significantly associated with PHR, NHR, and MHR, with OR values of 2.08, 1.64, and 2.94 ( p < 0.01), and a marginally significant association with LHR (OR = 1.48, p < 0.05).

Briefly, patients with and without VH did not differ for any demographic, clinical or neuropsychological characteristics, except for the NPI total score ( p = 0.01) and the presence of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

However, the mouse FcμR domain shows a marginally significant lower Tm than human FcμR ( p = 0.05).

Statistical significance was defined as Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted FDR < 0.05, and marginally significant trends were defined as P < .05.

Congruency was marginally significant on the P200 amplitude [ F (1, 15) = 4.56, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.233], where incongruent conditions showed an enhanced positivity (Figure 3A ).

Introns and 5′UTR sequences show no significant departure from the 1 : 1 ratio of GC→AT versus AT→GC substitutions expected under equilibrium base composition; there is a marginally significant ( Χ 2 =4.24, p <0.05) deficit of GC→AT substitutions for 3′UTR sequences.

Statistical significance was calculated using the two-sided Welch’s t -test for comparisons of two groups or the Tukey-Kramer test for multiple comparisons, with statistical significance set at p ≤ 0.1 (marginally significant), p ≤ 0.05, and p ≤ 0.01 (significant difference).