Barely Significant
← all phrases

“marginally significant”

26,083 sentences · 26,083 papers · 36,483 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p>=0.1

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

marginally significantp = .051.0× alphagold
The Wald test procedure revealed a marginally significant difference across genders ( p = .05) in the link between the describing scale and couple satisfaction (men: β = .35, p < .001; women: β = .19, p = .01), which imply that the relation between the describing facet and couple satisfaction was stronger for men compared with women.
marginally significantp = 0.051.0× alphagold
Higher plasma BDNF levels are associated with slower change in white matter volume with age ( Table 2 ) A significant BDNF by sex interaction was observed for the trajectories of frontal WM volume (F(1,360) = 7.52, p = 0.006; Table 1 ), where a strong but marginally significant trend was present for slower rates of frontal WM decline in association with higher BDNF levels in females (p = 0.05).
marginally significantp < .051.0× alphagold
We found that father–child discrepancies in perceived paternal responsiveness and demandingness, and mother–child discrepancy in perceived maternal control were associated negatively with achievement motivation of economically disadvantaged adolescents, with Pearson’s r of −.18 ( p < .006, two-tailed multistage Bonferroni procedure was carried out), −.12 ( p < .05, marginally significant), −.18 ( p < .006), respectively, indicating small to medium effect size.
marginally significantP < 0.051.0× alphagold
The Shannon diversity model accounts for 54.4% of the variation, with significant contributions from salinity ( edf = 1.3, F = 12.9, P < 0.001), C/N ratio ( edf = 1, F = 21.5, P < 0.001), and δ 13 C ( edf = 2, F = 6.9, P < 0.01) and a marginally significant effect from temperature ( edf = 2.1, F = 3.2, P < 0.05).
marginally significantp <0.051.0× alphagold
Response efficacy had a significant positive impact ( β = 0.470, p <0.001); perceived threat also exerted a significant positive effect ( β = 0.289, p <0.001); response cost showed a significant negative influence ( β = −0.156, p <0.001); and self-efficacy exhibited a marginally significant positive association ( β = 0.092, p <0.05).
marginally significantp = 0.0501.0× alphagold
Group-specific analyses showed that this relationship was driven primarily by the expert group, which demonstrated a significant medium positive correlation (ρ = 0.4006, p < 0.001, 95% CI [0.2617, 0.5233]), and the Gemini group, which showed a marginally significant correlation (ρ = 0.3121, p = 0.050, 95% CI [0.0007, 0.5684]).
marginally significantp = .0501.0× alphagold
For the N290 component, an exploratory 2 (condition: helping, hindering) × 2 (hemisphere: left, right) × 2 (age group: 6-month, 12-month) mixed ANOVA found a significant main effect of age group, F (1, 71)= 7.17, p = .009, η 2 = .09, and a marginally significant main effect of condition, F (1, 71)= 3.99, p = .050, η 2 = .05 (see Fig. 5 ).