“marginally significant”

The amount of lignin, relative to the initial values, between high management intensity (BA or SA) forests and low management intensity (BU and BS) forests was marginally significant at 180 DAI and 284 DAI (Klason lignin, P = 0.0500 and 0.0518) and at 180, 284 and 362 DAI (total lignin, P = 0.0558, 0.0541 and 0.0923, respectively; data not shown).

Interaction test for OS between treatment and PIK3CA was significant in the univariate ( P = 0.04) and marginally significant in the multivariate analysis ( P = 0.05).

The difference between switch and non-switch trials was marginally significant in the passive control group, F (1,56) = 4.02, p = 0.050, ƞ p 2 = 0.067 and non-significant in the active control group, F (1,56) < 1.

Among violent offenders only, sedatives tended to be associated with fatal violence ( p =0.06), whereas amphetamine, homelessness, age, and (marginally significant, p =0.05) heroin were negatively associated with fatal violence, as opposed to non-fatal violence.

Push ratio showed a marginally significant increase at 1-month post-PFT (Est = 1.61, p = 0.05).

For endurance ( Figure 2A ), the pooled analysis of the two studies indicated a marginally significant improvement in the C. sinensis supplementation group compared with the placebo group ( p = 0.05), with low heterogeneity (I 2 = 20%).

However, when the analysis was confined to 2017–2022 data, HPV16/18 prevalence decreased from 90.5% to 64.7% among young women aged 20–29 years, and this progressive decrease was marginally significant ( p = 0.05; Cochran‐Armitage trend test). 4.

Marginally significant main effect of stimulus pair (F=3.98, p=0.05) was revealed in the test phase, with controls showing a significantly higher preference in Frequent Winner vs Frequent Loser (FWFL) pair than patients (t=-2.25, p=0.028).

Additionally, MR Egger detected noteworthy heterogeneity in the relationship between GERD and PP ( P = 0.036), while IVW suggested the relationship to be marginally significant ( P = 0.050).

A single mlh3 deletion has a relatively small effect on in/del repair, slightly raising the efficiency of insertion repair compared to wild type and slightly decreasing the efficiency of deletion repair, although the difference in both cases is marginally significant (P = 0.05) ( Tables 3 and 4 ).

3e ), which is marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

The patient’s rights domain score showed a marginally significant difference in the IPW-adjusted analysis (−2.60 points; 95% CI −5.16 to −0.04; P= .05) but not in the unadjusted (−2.05 points; 95% CI −4.61 to 0.52; P =.12) or MI-adjusted analyses (−2.92 points; 95% CI −6.93 to 1.09; P =.15).

A marginally significant association was found between inattention and overall IEO score (OR = 0.95; p = 0.050).

First, the associations of the selected risk alleles were marginally significant [α (significance level of Bonferroni correction for multiple testing < P <0.05; α=0.05/35 SNPs/three genetic models=0.00048).

Briefly, patients with and without VH did not differ for any demographic, clinical or neuropsychological characteristics, except for the NPI total score ( p = 0.01) and the presence of rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder, which was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).

However, when uncertainty was high (Figure 7B ), the LC lesioned model had a marginally significant effect ( p < 0.05; t -test with alpha = 0.017, Bonferroni corrected).

Females were slightly older than males, with a mean age of 43.53 ± 3.01 years compared to 36.63 ± 12.80 years for males, a marginally significant difference ( p = 0.05); regarding ethnicity, the sample was predominantly Caucasian, with no statistically significant difference between the two sexes ( p = 0.323).

Probability values <0.10 but >0.05 (0.10< P <0.05) were considered marginally significant, and values <0.05 ( P <0.05) were considered significant.

However, pre- and post changes in muscle soreness were marginally significant for groups 2 and 3 ( P < 0.05).

The first step was to screen the genes using Cox proportional hazard regression models to identify any genes that had at least a marginally significant association ( p < 0.05) with the outcome (OS).

ANOVA showed that this factor, the derived eABR type, was marginally significant F(2, 14) = 3.62; p = 0.05.

In Table S5 , we also reported the proteins in each complex that are marginally significant (p < 0.05) based on the univariate association test using mixed effects regression models.

Comparison of the iCBT and sEFM Regarding comparison of the iCBT and sEFM, there were significant difference at T3 (six weeks after T2) in favor of iCBT on the CES-D (−1.83, 95% CI: −3.39 to −0.28, p = 0.02) and marginally significant difference in favor of iCBT on the GAD-7 (−0.79, 95% CI: −1.58 to 0.00, p = 0.05), respectively.

Effects of omega-3 supplementation on blood clotting function and cell blood count (CBC) The lymphocyte count increased in the omega-3 group compared to the control group, though this effect was marginally significant (11.59 vs 11.80, F = 4.08, P = 0.05).

Pairwise comparisons of species communities identified marginally significant differences only between MGA and UGA (p = 0.05) and DrP and MtP (p = 0.05).