“marginally significant”

From 1979/1991 to 2009, a negative trend was present in expected CIDs over time, which was significant or marginally significant for model A (−0.19 ± 0.06 days/year, p = .005), model B (−0.14 ± 0.07 days/year, p = .07), and CID observations (−0.23 ± 0.13 days/year, p = .11).

This association was highly significant also in the subset of conventional variant PTC ( P = 0.005) and marginally significant in follicular variant PTC ( P = 0.06).

We observed a significant CR-SOCIAL main effect in the theta frequency band for eyes-open local LLC values, F (1,94) = 16.060 p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.146, along with a marginally significant CR-SOCIAL main effect in low alpha, F (1,94) = 8.385, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.082.

There was a marginally significant effect for Target, F (1, 49) = 12, p < 0.005, with Love (0.457) less than Salted (0.468).

Absorbed dose is a marginally significant predictor for progression ( p value = 0.005).

116 In our previous study on patients with T2D following a very low carbohydrate intervention, there was a marginally significant increase in eGFR at 1 year. 72 A post hoc analysis of these data revealed that a higher mean BHB at 1 year (β=5.04, p=0.005) was significantly associated with a greater increase in mean eGFR (unpublished data).

Furthermore, a marginally significant difference was observed for the 100% propylene glycol condition ( p < 0.005).

The literacy DTC was marginally significant (− 19.39% p = 0.005).

Individual variable testing revealed that heart failure showed a marginally significant result ( χ 2 = 7.734, P = 0.005), suggesting potential time-varying effects for this covariate.

After Greenhouse-Geisser correction, a marginally significant interaction time × sex was found ( F (1.59, 1) = 6.15, p = 0.005, η p 2 = 0.07; Fig. 2 ).

Results: Duffy null was strongly associated with higher hs-CRP (meta-analysis p = 2.62 × 10 −9 ), but the association was largely attenuated, though still marginally significant ( p = 0.005), after conditioning on known CRP locus alleles in linkage disequilibrium with the Duffy gene.

There are a total of 21 comparisons, so in this section statistically "significant" is defined as p < 0.002, "marginally significant" as p < 0.005, and "possibly significant" as p < 0.05.

While not statistically significantly associated with aTRH in our other analyses, the variant had a consistent direction of effect in all our analyses, with marginally significant p -values for the multi-ethnic aTRH versus treated controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.88 [0.80–0.96], p = 5.15E-03), AA aTRH versus normotensive controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.83 [0.72–0.95], p = 8.47E-03), and EA aTRH versus normotensive controls (OR [95% CI] = 0.81 [0.69–0.94], p = 5.81E-03).

We note as a caveat to this conclusion that, when we analyzed the subset of networks presented in Fig 3B that were generated with combinations of zero and three features, there was a marginally significant correlation between the number of external genomic features integrated and the proportion of interactions that were subsequently discovered (ρ = 0.17, P = 0.0055).

The SatScan also revealed one marginally significant ( p = 0.0056) time-space hotspot in cattle between 20/10/2022–20/03/2023 in southern Laos (106.062 N,14.7513 E) with a radius of 0.49 km ( Fig. 2 ). 4 Discussion In this study, we found that among livestock tested across the 18 Lao provinces, the prevalence of rickettsial seropositivity was low (<10%).

Google Desktop generally achieved higher recall than RadReportMiner; the difference was marginally significant per-document ( p = 0.0057) but not statistically significant on a mean basis per-term ( p = 0.273); for two individual terms, the differences were statistically significant.

The linear regression model explained 54.4% of the variance of ECAS‐Language scores ( F (19, 219) = 13.77; p < 0.001), with only the ECAS‐Executive positively predicting them at α adjusted = 0.0028 ( β = 0.46; t (219) = 5.97; p < 0.001; η 2 = 0.07), and a similar, although marginally significant, effect being found for ECAS‐Visuo‐spatial ( β = 0.15; t (219) = 2.78; p = 0.006; η 2 = 0.02).

Thus, marginally significant results (e.g., IL-6 − 174 G/C, p = 0.006) may not survive Bonferroni correction but could remain significant under FDR depending on the overall p-value distribution.

No other predictors indicated significance except for a marginally significant positive effect of ALSFRS-R scores ( β = 0.21, t (314) = 2.78, p = 0.006, η 2 = 0.02).

In this age group, we noticed suggestive causal association between BMI with increased risk of DM (OR = 1.217, 95% CI 1.020-1.452, p = 0.029), and lower fasting glucose (OR = 0.963, 95% CI 0.936-0.991, p = 0.009), as well as marginally significant association with fasting insulin (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.872-0.977, p = 0.006) in females, not in males.

Now, the sex-adjusted marginally significant effect of compassion in 1997 on DNAmPhenoAge became statistically significant ( b = −0.54; p = 0.006, n = 843).

Sex and age group were significant ( p < 0.001), and core grain food serves had small but significant interaction with age group ( p < 0.001) and a marginally significant interaction with sex ( p = 0.006).

A simple slope analysis showed that the main effect was marginally significant for the male group ( b (292) = 2.59, p = .006).

At the family level, AMF richness was a marginally significant predictor of yield at the Oregon site ( F 1,4.92 = 21.3, P = 0.006, conditional coefficient of determination [ R c 2 ] = 0.88); every additional family represented in the AMF community at the Oregon site was associated with an increase in 0.61 Mg · ha −1 of switchgrass yield ( Fig. 7 ).

The HIT group showed a marginally significant effect (SMD = -2.14, 95% CI [-4.69, 0.41], p = 0.006, I2 = 76%), with substantial between-study variability.