“marginally significant”

Thus, marginally significant results (e.g., IL-6 − 174 G/C, p = 0.006) may not survive Bonferroni correction but could remain significant under FDR depending on the overall p-value distribution.

No other predictors indicated significance except for a marginally significant positive effect of ALSFRS-R scores ( β = 0.21, t (314) = 2.78, p = 0.006, η 2 = 0.02).

The dark:light activity ratio was reduced (LMM, p=0.024) in Off6-cycle, and there was a marginally significant circatidal (10–14 hr) component (LSP, p=0.006).

2 , left panel: left amygdala, p < 0.0066, marginally significant, t (276) = −2.74; right panel: right amygdala, p < 0.0061, t (276) = −2.77).

Motor symptoms showed a marginally significant decrease (p = 0.0064): superficial (p = 0.2285, insignificant) and vibratory sensitivity (p = 0.1095, not significant).

The association for CORE_MATRISOME was found to be marginally significant (p = 0.0067 under SKAT) ( Figure 3 B).

We also found marginally significant heritability for G × E interaction in TDI ( h G×E 2 = 0.42%, P = 6.70 × 10 −3 calculated by LDSC; h G×E 2 = 0.23%, P = 1.16 × 10 −2 calculated by LDAK-SumHer).

Ileum tissue showed a significantly differential increase in InsP to inositol (LMM post hoc: Control − Inositol t 227 = 5.593, P <0.001) and a marginally significant decrease in InsP to phytase (LMM post hoc : Control − Phytase 6000 FTU/kg t 227 = 3.267, P =0.007).

These differences are statistically or marginally significant between the ′04-T and ′04-L groups (P = .007, unpaired t-test) and the ′04-T and ′04-N groups (P = .03, unpaired t-test) after adjustment for multiple comparisons ( Figure 2B ).

Discarding the eight marginally significant cases, this shows a significantly more frequent prediction of increased damage ( χ 1 2 = 7.35, p = 0.007).

control resulted in a significant difference for both audio and spontaneous data for LZC, MPE and CD (all p < 0.001) Differences for MSE in spontaneous data were marginally significant ( p = 0.007).

A main effect of Stereotype was found in the by-participants analysis, along with a marginally significant effect in the by-items analysis, F 1 (2,56) = 5.50, p = 0.007; F 2 (2,32) = 3.00, p = 0.064, with faster RTs to word pairs that contained a neutral role term ( M = 828 ms), than those that contained male-biased ( M = 850 ms) or female-biased terms ( M = 889 ms).

Importantly, similar to the behavioral results, pairwise comparisons showed no difference between sequence and random trials in block 1 ( p = 0.53) and block 2 ( p = 0.94) but did show higher levels of caudate activation for sequence versus random trials in block 3 ( p = 0.040; marginally significant after Bonferroni correction for the four comparisons) and block 4 ( p = 0.007; full significance after Bonferroni correction).

The cortical coherence of gamma bands between the precuneus and PCC (precuneus-PCC) showed marginally significant difference ( Z = −2.42, p = 0.007, adjusted p = 0.068), suggesting a stronger functional connectivity in the Asy condition.

Plasma TMB was also a marginally significant predictive factor in univariate analysis for OS; however, higher pTMB (HR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18–0.76, p = 0.007) was associated with improved OS in the multivariate analysis.

Comparing the groups, we observe significant or marginally significant differences for the AP metabolites: C3 ( p = 0.007), properdin ( p = 0.016), FB ( p = 0.084), C5 ( p = 0.057), and FH ( p < 0.001).

Positive correlation with apical tolerance and strong branching response after apical damage was significant in low competition and marginally significant in high competition (low competition, r = 0.518, P = 0.007, N = 26; high competition, r = 0.359, P < 0.093, N = 23).

Differences between HOC and HHC were marginally significant at this time ( P = 0.00719), but both cornea models were significantly lower than controls ( P = 1.82 × 10 –180 for HOC and P = 2.96 × 10 –196 for HHC).

The main effect of age on pitch strength was marginally significant ( F (1, 473) = 7.24; p = 0.0074; pBf = 0.0958; η p 2 = 0.02).

These lncRNA and neighboring protein-coding gene pairs showed marginally significant greater correlated expression compared to randomized gene pairs using single-cell expression ( P -value = 0.008) but not when using single-nucleus expression ( P -value = 0.063).

Furthermore, an overall analysis indicated a marginally significant association between the A1298C polymorphism and MI risk in the recessive model (OR = 1.27, 95 % CI = 1.06–1.51, P = 0.008), allelic model (OR = 1.18, 95 % CI = 1.01–1.39, P = 0.03), and CC vs .

A 2 (rater gender) × 2 (partner type) mixed-factors ANOVA on rater accuracy showed a significant main effect for partner type, in addition to a marginally significant interaction ( p = 0.008). 2 See Table 2 for means, standard error, and two-way ANOVA statistics for the ratings from Study 3.

Clinically, these variants are associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk; a 2023 meta-analysis of 66 studies ( n = 37,263) demonstrated that C677T carriers have a 13–20% higher odds of myocardial infarction (MI) under dominant (OR = 1.16, 95% CI:1.06–1.28, P = 0.008) and recessive (OR = 1.20, 95% CI:1.12–1.28, P < 0.001) models, with similar but marginally significant associations for A1298C (recessive OR = 1.27, 95% CI:1.06–1.51, P = 0.008), underscoring the need for genetic screening in CVD prevention [ 44 ].

In EAS, the proportions of selection increased from a significant underrepresentation at the very periphery of the network (BC = 0; nominal P = 0.001, FDR corrected P = 0.007) to a marginally significant overrepresentation with high BC scores of 2,001–20,000 (nominal P = 0.008, FDR corrected P = 0.025).

FAZ-P did not differ significantly between Control and DMI ( U = 1061, P = 0.211, r = 0.45), while the difference between Non-DMI and DMI was marginally significant ( U = 1428.5, P = 0.008, r = 0.12).