“marginally significant”

It should be noted that although the iV1-cV1 connection revealed a marginally significant interaction effect ( p = 0.004), simple effects analyses demonstrated that this interaction was driven by the surprising significantly higher correlations produced by control non-dominant-eye compared with dominant eye viewing ( p = 0.014), whereas strabismic participants with amblyopia showed marginally lower correlations from amblyopic eye compared with fellow eye viewing conditions ( p = 0.051).

The change in performance for the Jump Down Test was marginally significant in discordance with changes in the sensorimotor variable cEQ Score measuring balance control ( P = 0.004).

However, there’s a marginally significant trend for gender ( p = 0.053) and a significant trend for drinking status ( p = 0.004), suggesting that the effect of social activities might vary more substantially across these categories.

Skill variable is also marginally significant: after the Skill game the subjects overall subtract 15% less of their targets' winnings than after the Luck game ( t = −3.66, p = 0.004).

There was a highly significant interaction between the effects of seizure and cortex for occurrence [ F (1,42) = 9.071, p = 0.004] and Up states index of spontaneous activity [ F (1,42) = 12.7, p = 0.001]; and a marginally significant effect of the two on Up state amplitude [ F (1,42) = 4.172, p = 0.047] and rectified area [ F (1,42) = 4.151, p = 0.048] ( Supplementary Text , Section 2.1.2 , Table 9 ).

Phylogenetic generalised least squares regression The phylogenetic generalised least squares (PGLS) analyses on the Bulbophyllum backbone phylogeny revealed a generally strong, either marginally significant ( R 2 = 0.883, P = 0.060) or highly significant ( R 2 = 0.993, P = 0.004) relationship of, respectively, the stem and crown ages of the four lineages with their extant species numbers.

As shown in Models 2 and 5 in SI Appendix , Table S12 , Nudging Weekly Logins showed a directional BH-adjusted impact on student progress during weeks 5 to 8 (additional lessons completed = 0.08, 4.49% increase; d = 0.02; unadjusted P = 0.01, BH-adjusted P = 0.11) and a marginally significant BH-adjusted impact during weeks 9 to 12 (additional lessons completed = 0.07, 5.31% increase; d = 0.02; unadjusted P = 0.004, BH-adjusted P = 0.06).

The insert tab task was marginally significant in predicting trial duration, F (22,1) = 10.2, p = 0.004, R 2 = 0.33, β = 2 seconds.

A 2 × 2 mixed-factor ANOVA (group x set size) revealed a marginally significant main effect of set size with higher binding errors at a set size of three, relative to two, items (F (1,49) = 9.24, p = 0.004, η p 2 = 0.16).

In this Cox model, age, pathological TNM classification, and TP53 mutation were also significant or marginally significant factors for overall survival ( p = .004, .073, and .051, respectively).

Interestingly, a marginally significant odds ratio (1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.01; P = .004) was obtained for a lower CD4 nadir when the considered virologic outcome was TND.

In the main cohort study, there were significant or marginally significant differences between the three groups in age [F(2,159) = 5.76, p = 0.004], gender [χ 2 (2) = 6.74, p = 0.034], and living situation [χ 2 (2) = 5.76, p = 0.056].

Results of the log‐rank test were marginally significant (x 2 = 8.417, P = 0.004): individuals without an elevated CUGBP1 had a TTP of 7.868 months, while those with an elevated CUGBP1 had a TTP of 5.076 months, as shown in Figure 2 .

The analyses show significant and marginally significant associations of this allele with HDL-C ( β = -3.8, p = 4.7×10 −3 ) and TG ( β = 6.6, p = 3.3×10 −3 ) in ARIC and BMI ( β = -3.4, p = 5.7×10 −2 ) in the FHS original cohort ( S1 Table ).

Consistent with the stated hypothesis, people with proportionally lower cNFL concentration had a marginally significant increase in brain atrophy measured by semiquantitative outcome ( P = 0.0049) and BPFr ( P = 0.053) in the training cohort.

Importantly, the correlation remained marginally significant after introducing sex, age, years of education, neuroticism (N) and MWT-B verbal IQ as covariates (r = −.29; p = .005).

From 1979/1991 to 2009, a negative trend was present in expected CIDs over time, which was significant or marginally significant for model A (−0.19 ± 0.06 days/year, p = .005), model B (−0.14 ± 0.07 days/year, p = .07), and CID observations (−0.23 ± 0.13 days/year, p = .11).

The literacy DTC was marginally significant (− 19.39% p = 0.005).

The removal of one influential data point (see figure 1 ) weakened these relationships, becoming non-significant for ROUTINE ( p = 0.27), marginally significant for OXPHOS ( p = 0.057) but remaining highly significant for ETS ( p = 0.005).

Moreover, three of these correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.005 for all three correlations), while a fourth was marginally significant ( p = 0.076).

Gene set enrichment analyses were performed with the clusterProfiler Bioconductor package ( 57 ), using the hypergeometric test to assess enrichment of marginally significant DEGs (at P < 0.005) that were stratified by case–control directionality, against a background of all expressed genes that had Entrez gene IDs.

There are a total of 21 comparisons, so in this section statistically "significant" is defined as p < 0.002, "marginally significant" as p < 0.005, and "possibly significant" as p < 0.05.

This association was highly significant also in the subset of conventional variant PTC ( P = 0.005) and marginally significant in follicular variant PTC ( P = 0.06).

Individual variable testing revealed that heart failure showed a marginally significant result ( χ 2 = 7.734, P = 0.005), suggesting potential time-varying effects for this covariate.

For PCV, only rs36005462 in an independent domain showed a marginally significant association (OR = 0.58; P = 0.0050).