“marginal significance”

However, beyond the inflection points, the inverse association of ANS with ACM weakened considerably, with only marginal significance observed for the 365-day outcome (P=0.04) ( Table 3 ).

However, the marginal significance ( p -value = 0.04) limits the value of this module.

This should be interpreted with caution because the statistical data suggested that this was a weak correlation (small correlation coefficient, Rho = 0.18) with marginal significance ( p = 0.04).

Regarding the type of the first clinical manifestation, visual disturbance was more frequent in patients treated with CS/IS than those with MS-DMDs, with marginal significance (64 vs. 42%, respectively, p = 0.04).

Finally, controlling for both gene length and expression level, the correlation between gene duplication and alternative splicing is reduced to marginal significance ( Fig. 4C ) ( P = 0.04).

While DOACs showed a trend toward reduced mortality (RR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.81-0.99, p=0.04), the marginal significance and confidence intervals approaching the null value suggest a modest effect.

For the right intra-parietal sulcus, a post-hoc pairwise comparison of the information values across subjects reached marginal significance with respect to the right intra-parietal (p = 0.04), right frontal eye field (p = 0.04) and superior frontal gyrus (p = 0.06).

The overall mortality rate was 14.4%, with neutrophil percentage (adjusted HR: 1.017, P=0.01) and lymphocyte percentage (adjusted HR: 0.985, P=0.04) emerging as independent predictors of mortality, while the PNR demonstrated marginal significance (adjusted HR: 0.995, P=0.04).

Therefore, the observed associations—particularly those with marginal significance (e.g., rs17672135, p = 0.04)—should be interpreted with caution.

While the difference in influenza infection was statistically significant, RSV infection showed only marginal significance ( p = 0.04).

The other NIS based study revealed a poorer association between age and in-hospital mortality with marginal significance (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.10–1.06; P = 0.04).

The overall interaction tests did not achieve statistical significance for inhibitory control (p = 0.19) and reached only marginal significance for working memory (p = 0.04).

pylori seropositivity was associated with less insulin resistance, albeit with only marginal significance ( P = 0.04) after adjustment for covariates.

While for hemorrhagic stroke, only marginal significance was observed among age group of 50–90 years (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.14–1.34; P = 0.04).

On the other hand, acetic and propionic acids were negatively correlated, although with marginal significance, to Johnsonella and Johnsonella ignava (all p < 0.040).

Marginal significance (i.e., without Bonferroni correction) was observed for the comparison of water to citrus in subject V1XS8 ( p = 0.04) and to coffee in subject O9ZEA ( p = 0.04).

Performance for middle-aged adults reached marginal significance ( Z = −2.0, p = 0.04).

When it comes to the improved OS for CRT, drawing the conclusion should be discreet because of the marginal significance ( P = 0.04) and obvious between-study heterogeneity.

Shapiro-Wilk’s test for the total sample returned significant results only for fluency and elaboration, with marginal significance for flexibility ( p = .04).

The risk of composite outcome was lower in users than in non-users with marginal significance (adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99; p=0.040).

7 ( N =127), and the marginal significance reported by Caselli et al. 6 ( P =0.04) caution that previous significant findings may to an extent reflect type 1 error.

Accordingly, of the two non-significant studies in our sample, one of them–the ACCORD trial [ 60 ]–had a replication with a significant result–in this case, a large meta-analysis that reached marginal significance (p = 0.04).

The only statistically significant association found, that of co-morbid ADHD with rs806379, should probably be regarded as a false positive because of its marginal significance (0.05>p>0.04) in multiple statistical tests performed (4 SNPs x 4 disorders x 6 models).

The T allele showed a protective effect in the homozygous model with marginal significance (P = 0.04, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; Fig. 3 ).

This confirms that the marginal significance of the baseline PR% difference (corrected P = 0.040) remains valid after accounting for multiple comparisons.