bungeanum Maxim were found to be in the follwing order: stem > fruit > leaf, and the difference in expression levels between stem and leaf reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.05) [ 55 ].
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
There existed extremely significant difference between the ACE inhibition value of sample and control within 30 min ( p < .05), which demonstrated that after the pepsin treatment of squash seed protein released bioactive peptides from the native protein structure, and these peptides possessed the ACE inhibitory activity (Figure 5 ). 4.
According to the results of the present study, all risk factors, including age, parity, BCS, milk yield, breeding method, and management conditions, had extremely significant variations and are substantially related to the incidence of RB ( P < 0.05).
All results were recorded as the means ± SE, and the differences were considered statistically non-significant, significant, or extremely significant when p ≥ 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively.
The standards of significant and extremely significant are p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. 3.
We considered marker-trait associations that were significant and extremely significant at p < 0.05.
P value <0.001 were considered extremely significant (***), P value ranging between 0.001 to 0.01 were very significant (**), P value 0.01 to 0.05 as significant (*) and P value >0.05 were not significant (ns) (Student's t test).
Probability values of p < 0.001 were considered extremely statistically significant: p < 0.01 extremely significant and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
The index measured was taken as the statistical unit, and the results were expressed as “mean ± standard error”, where p < 0.01 meant that the difference was extremely significant, and p < 0.05 meant that the difference was significant. 0.05 ≤ p < 0.1 indicates a trend. 3.
After thestatistical analysis, the treatment group displayed extremely significant differences compared with the control group ( P < 0.05).
The results showed that butyric acid, valeric acid, isovaleric acid, caproic acid, and pH had significant or extremely significant correlations with cecal microorganisms ( p < 0.05).
A p value < 0.01 (**) shows an extremely significant relationship while 0.01 < p < 0.05 (*) represents a significant relationship.
The relationship between textural properties and WHC was extremely significant ( p < 0.05).
Statistical analysis shows an extremely significant difference between the contact angles of both samples ( p < 0.05).
p < 0.05 and p < 0.01 were considered significant and extremely significant, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. 3.
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≤ 0.01, that the difference was extremely significant; p ≤ 0.05, that the difference reached a significant level; p > 0.05, that the difference was not significant.
The results were expressed by mean ± standard deviation (SD), and p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant, P < 0.01 was considered to be extremely significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
All data were exhibited as the means ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and the differences were thought statistically significant and extremely significant when P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively.
Differences are considered significant and extremely significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. 3.
The significance mark: The same letter indicates an insignificant difference ( p > 0.05), while different letters indicate an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.05). 2.5.
Significant differences were determined using a two-tailed unpaired t -test, with ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 indicating extremely significant differences and "ns" ( p ≥ 0.05) denoting non-significant differences.
Statistically significant and extremely significant were determined to be P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, while p < 0.01 and <0.001 indicated very significant and extremely significant differences, respectively (∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001).
In the six wine samples, except for the alcohol note, all others were significant or extremely significant ( p < 0.05 or p < 0.001).
Significant and extremely significant differences were declared at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. 3.