Duncan's multiple-range test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) used to analyze the difference between data from different groups and statistical differences were considered significant and extremely significant at the P value < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively.
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.01 was extremely significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.
Prognosis Score of Emergency Nursing GOS score results of the two groups showed that the proportion of patients with good rating in the study group (56.0%) was significantly higher than that in the control group (30.4%), and the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.05).
Generally, it was considered that there was a significant difference or extremely significant difference in statistics between two sets of data when P < 0.05 or P < 0.01, which labeled as * or **, respectively.
There was an extremely significant difference between the inhibitory effect of nanocurcumin-coated gutta-percha and conventional gutta-percha ( P < 0.05).
The statistically significant and extremely significant differences were represented by P < 0.05 (*) and P < 0.01 (**), respectively.
P < 0.01 means extremely significant difference, P < 0.05 means significant difference, and P > 0.05 means that the difference was not significant.
p < 0.01 indicates that the difference was extremely significant, and p < 0.05 indicates that the difference was significant. 3.
Seven extremely significant recombination signals were found among isolates that were under the threshold of seven algorithms with a high acceptable P < 0.05.
When p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, the difference was significant and extremely significant, respectively. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01. 5.
Significant and extremely significant differences were declared at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively.
All results were recorded as the means ± SE, and the differences were considered statistically non-significant, significant, or extremely significant when p ≥ 0.05, p < 0.05, and p < 0.01, respectively.
The RNA-seq results were analyzed by the SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0 and R software programs ( p < 0.01 means extremely significant, p < 0.05 means significant).
a trend toward significancep < 0.05
extremely significantqualified
Data were expressed as means ± standard error of the mean (SEM), 0.05 < p < 0.1 indicated a trend toward significance, 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05 was considered significant, and p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant. 3.
Differences were regarded as significant and extremely significant at p < .05 and p < .01, respectively. 3.
When the statistical result was P < 0.05, the difference is significant, while P < 0.01 indicates that the difference is extremely significant, and P > 0.05 indicates that the difference is not significant.
Significant and extremely significant differences were indicated by p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. 5.
Furthermore, the change of this characteristic across sites was extremely significant ( p = 0.05).
According to the correlation analysis of differential metabolites in the serum and VFA parameters ( Figure 8A ), results showed that Acetate, Propionate, Butyrate, and L-Carnitine, PC (18:1/0:0), 2-amino-4-({2-[(2-carbon-2-hydroxy-1-phenyl ethyl) sulfinyl]-1-(carbo) Metabolites such as 3-Buten-1-amine and Glucosylsphingosine were negatively correlated with N,N-dimethyl-Safingol, 16-Hydroxy hexadecanoic acid, Polyoxyethylene 40 monostearate and PC [16:0/18:2(9Z, 2z)] and other metabolites showed positive correlation, among which Butyrate and L-Carnitine had extremely significant negative correlation ( p < 0.05), Isovalerate and PC (18:1/0:0) and PC [20:5(5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)/0:0].
Differences were considered significant and extremely significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.
The different letters such as a, b, c and *** represent a significant and extremely significant difference between groups ( p < 0.05 and p < 0.001, respectively) in qPCR experiment. 3.
bungeanum Maxim were found to be in the follwing order: stem > fruit > leaf, and the difference in expression levels between stem and leaf reached an extremely significant level ( p < 0.05) [ 55 ].
There existed extremely significant difference between the ACE inhibition value of sample and control within 30 min ( p < .05), which demonstrated that after the pepsin treatment of squash seed protein released bioactive peptides from the native protein structure, and these peptides possessed the ACE inhibitory activity (Figure 5 ). 4.
Compared with the control group, the expressions of P53 and Caspase3 in the pCDH-LINC01554 group showed an extremely significant increase ( P < 0.05, Fig. 3 D and E).
P < 0.05 was deemed to indicate a significant difference, P < 0.01 indicated an extremely significant difference, and P > 0.05 indicated no significant difference.