“extremely significant”

Significant differences were determined using a two-tailed unpaired t -test, with ∗∗∗ p < 0.001 indicating extremely significant differences and "ns" ( p ≥ 0.05) denoting non-significant differences.

Differences are considered significant and extremely significant at p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively. 3.

Significant and extremely significant differences were declared at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. 3.

The following statistical differences were detected: * p < 0.05, significant; ** p < 0.01, more significant; *** p < 0.001, extremely significant; and p > 0.05, not significant. 3.

Student’ t-test was used to test the significance of differences relative to the sham, unless otherwise specially indicated; significant difference and extremely significant difference were inferred as * and ** if p-value < 0.05 or < 0.01, respectively.

A p -value < 0.05 or p -value < 0.01 were respectively regarded as significant differences or extremely significant differences. ** p < 0.05 and **** p < 0.001 as compared to control sample, ns means no significant. 5.

If p < 0.05, there was significant difference; if p < 0.01, the difference was extremely significant; if p > 0.05, there was no significant difference.

When 0.01 < p < 0.05 is considered to have a significant difference, p < 0.01 is considered to have an extremely significant difference, and p > 0.05 is considered to have no significant difference.

The criteria for determining statistical results were as follows: P < 0.01 meant the data difference was extremely significant; 0.01 < P < 0.05 meant the data difference was significant; P > 0.05 meant the data difference was not significant.

The content of epicatechin and saponins showed a significant positive correlation ( P < 0.05) and an extremely significant positive correlation ( P < 0.05), respectively, with the pH value.

The p < 0.05 and p ≤ 0.01 was considered to indicate statistically significant and extremely significant. * p ≤ 0.05 and ** p ≤ 0.01.

Notably, on the 30th day of exposure when all zoea larvae had reached the late larval stage, there was an extremely significant induction in the expression of Ec RACK1 mRNA ( p < 0.05). 4.

The relationship between leaf N‐P stoichiometry and life history stage and environmental conditions showed significant or extremely significant correlations ( p < .05 or p < .01) (Table S2 ).

At 17 dpi ( Figure 8B ), Alistipes and unclassified_f_ Ruminococcaceae showed an extremely significant positive correlation with IFN-γ secretion ( P < 0.05), but Eisenbergiella and Norank_f_Clostridiales_vadinbb60_group were negatively correlated with it ( P < 0.05).

Effect of Glycine Nano-Selenium on Weight Gain and Organ Indices of Liver, Spleen, and Lungs of Mice Immunized with H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus Vaccine and Challenged with H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus As represented in Table 3 , the results showed that compared with the control group, the positive control, low dose (0.25 mg/kg), medium dose (0.5 mg/kg), and high dose (1 mg/kg) groups showed a significant or extremely significant difference in organ indices ( p < 0.05).

However, the difference in the flora composition between these groups and normal controls was extremely significant (Adonis P < 0.05).

If p < 0.05, there was a significant difference; if p < 0.01, the difference was extremely significant; and if p > 0.05, there was no significant difference.

As shown in Figures 5A – C , the ovarian expression level of FSHR , LHR and ESRα in the PC group during the whole laying period were increased compared with the NC group, especially in the late laying period, reaching a significant or extremely significant level ( p < 0.05, p < 0.01).

The results were considered significant or extremely significant at a level of p < 0.05 or p < 0.01.

The extremely significant correlation between phenolics and total antioxidant activity was also revealed by Pearson correlation analysis ( p < 0.05).

The statistical analyses were performed using student’s two tailed test in conjunction with Scheffe’s test for multiple comparison statistics considering p < 0.05, P < 0.01, and P < 0.001 as statistically significant, very significant and extremely significant values, respectively, whereas P > 0.05 is treated as statistically insignificant value.

The asterisks indicate the significance was statistically significant or extremely significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001). 3.

Statistics Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test using GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows ( a p-value < 0.001 extremely significant; b p-value 0.001 to 0.01 very significant; c p-value 0.01 to 0.05 significant; p-value > 0.05 not significant).

Probability values less than or equal to 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant and probability values less than or equal to 0.001 were considered to be extremely significant (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001).

p < 0.01 indicated extremely significant differences, p < 0.05 indicated significant differences, and p > 0.05 indicated no significant differences. 3.