“extremely significant”

Analyzing the histological type of the MMMT, homologous type was a protective factor for death (OR=0.3472) while heterologous type could be considered a risk factor (OR=2.880), both parameters being extremely significant (P=0.0247).

At the same time, regarding the extraction yield of phenols, the first term X 2 ( p -value < 0.05) showed extremely significant performance, while the second terms X 1 2 , X 2 2 , and X 3 2 ( p -value < 0.05) also showed significant performance.

6.0; differences with P values <0.01 were considered extremely significant, whereas those with P values <0.05 were considered significant. “*” represents P < 0.05 and “**” represents P < 0.01 in the t -test.

The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the significance of differences among the experimental samples ( p < 0.01 was considered extremely significant; 0.01 < p < 0.05 significant, and p > 0.05 not significant). 3.

The recovery time was negatively correlated with stress time and average HR and positively correlated with HF, RMSSD, and SDNN, and the results were significant or extremely significant ( p < 0.05 or 0.01).

** P < 0.01: extremely significant difference, * P < 0.05: significant difference.

The SL area showed a not-significant (P > 0.1) correlation with SR, and an extremely significant (P < 0.05) negative correlation with EL area (R = −0.16), PL area (R = −0.58), ER (R = −0.71), PR (R = −0.44), and SEPLR (R = −0.58).

Data with * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 were considered statistically significant and extremely significant, respectively, while 0.1 ≥ p ≥ 0.05 were considered as tendency.

As shown in Figure 2 B, the relative expression levels of other genes were significant or extremely significant in both the control group and the infected group ( P < 0.05 or P < 0.01), while the relative expression levels of IL-6 in the spleen and cecum of the controls were not significant ( P > 0.05).

Except for the control of individual traits, the phenotypic differences of all traits were extremely significant or significant (p<0.05) when considering the single year and two-year averages, and the frequency distribution of all traits was consistent with a normal distribution ( Supplementary Figure S2 ).

According to the results of the three-factor analysis of variance, the interaction between different breeds, different treatments, different breeds and different treatments had significant or extremely significant effects on the 19 traits in 3 years ( P < 0.05 or P < 0.01) ( Appendix Tables 5 – 7 ).

P value < 0.001 is considered extremely significant (***); P value from 0.001 to 0.01 very significant (**); P value from 0.01 to 0.05 significant (*); P value > 0.05 not significant (ns).

P < 0.01 means the difference is extremely significant and P < 0.05 means the difference is significant.

Asterisks indicate significant or extremely significant differences from the control (* for 0.01 ≤ p < 0.05, and ** for p < 0.01) using one-way ANOVA. 3.

Correlation Analysis and Source Apportionment of PTEs in Soil SPSS 26 correlation analysis of the PTEs in the soil of sites showed that a p value < 0.01 signified an extremely significant correlation, 0.01 < p < 0.05 was a significant correlation, and p > 0.05 was not a correlation.

Differences between groups were tested using independent samples t-test ( t-test ) or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and were considered significant or extremely significant when P < 0.05 or < 0.01, respectively.

Differences were considered statistically significant and statistically extremely significant when p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively.

Specifically, there was an extremely significant difference in metabolism of cofactors and vitamins and membrane transport between the HG and CON groups ( p < 0.05).

However, the significance of the values of all three extracts compared to the standard was extremely significant ( P < 0.05) at all levels of DPPH radical activity concentration ( Table 1 ).

The significant and extremely significant levels were set at p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively.

The LGG and CSE groups exhibited extremely significant lower abundance ( p < .05).

p < 0.05 indicates a significant difference, and p < 0.01 indicates an extremely significant difference. p > 0.05 indicates an insignificant difference.

Compared with the Cd group, the apoptosis of TM3 cells in the Cd + SFN2.5, Cd + SFN5 and Cd + SFN10 groups decreased, and the difference was extremely significant for the first two groups ( p < 0.05) and significant for the last group ( p < 0.01). 2.7.

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and p < 0.01 was extremely significant (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01). 5.

Duncan's multiple-range test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) used to analyze the difference between data from different groups and statistical differences were considered significant and extremely significant at the P value < 0.05 and < 0.01, respectively.