Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

To test this hypothesis, DLNCs from the mice treated with mianserin showed a significant decrease in anti-CD3-induced IL-17 production; a strong trend toward lower production of antigen-specific IFNγ and IL-17 was observed, although this did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2f ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.132.6× alphaplainly factual
The intensity of GLuc luminescence in rat blood tends to be higher in the IPP (+) group [IPP (−) vs IPP (+) (AU); 2600 ± 224 vs 2824 ± 241, p = 0.13, Cohen’s d = 0.96]: Although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.13), the large effect size in the animal experience (Cohen’s d = 0.96) suggests a notable trend (Fig. 7j ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0871.7× alphaplainly factual
When embryo grade (grade 3, grade 3 + 2, grade 2) was used as the dependent variable, whereas age (ys), PRL (ng/ml), estradiol levels the fifth day of rFSH administration (pg/ml) and survivin/ABL mRNA expression were used as independent variables, only estradiol levels on the fifth day of rFSH administration showed a trend for correlation to the embryo grade, however it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.087) (Table 3 ).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.0691.4× alphaplainly factual
highly significantqualifiedgold
The cumulative Kaplan Meyer survival differences did not reach statistical significance for the cut off of 70 bpm (log rank p = 0.069) but highly significant for the cut off of 75 bpm.
EA-ONCE/1 (Electroacupuncture Administered Once at PID 1) While EA treatment given only once at PID 1 showed a trend towards reducing tumor-associated nociception when compared to the tumor-no EA groups, this did not reach statistical significance in either male or female animals at any of the time points tested ( Figure 3(a) ).
While the GMV of the left thalamus in patients with dystonia (mean ± SD: 7092.346 ± 816.061) showed a trend towards reduction compared with that in healthy controls (mean ± SD: 7224.300 ± 927.542) ( P uncorrected = 0.011), it did not reach statistical significance after correction for multiple comparisons.
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.06451.3× alphaplainly factual
Summarizing the BM AML cell engraftment relative to PBS-treated mice across the three PDX models showed a trend towards reduced AML levels was observed in the PBMC + DNT group compared to the PBMC + PBS group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.0645) (Figure S3B), potentially due to the limited sample size, variability among patient samples, and the potent anti-leukemic activity mediated by PBMCs alone.