Barely Significant
← all phrases

“did not reach statistical significance”

111,028 sentences · 111,028 papers · 130,054 search hits before verification

In the literature

Sensitivity analysis for unobserved confounding The difference-in-difference analysis showed a trend towards more emergency admissions among intervention patients than controls, but the effect size was smaller than in the primary analysis and did not reach statistical significance (difference 0.10 admissions per head, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.26, p=0.220) (see online supplementary table S1 and figures S1 and S2).
did not reach statistical significancep = 0.18563.7× alphaplainly factual
Although the differences did not reach statistical significance using A one-way ANOVA (F(1.001, 4.004) = 2.549, p = 0.1856), the high coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.918) indicates a strong trend toward enhanced removal efficiency at 25 °C.
Familial longevity is significantly associated with the genetic risk score in the analysis with aggregated data from the two generations at the 0.05 level ( p -value 0.020) but did not reach statistical significance in either generation alone, although the association was borderline significant in the offspring with a p -value of 0.057.
While no correlation was found between fractional Lac (Lac/Total Carbon) and survival, the changes in fractional Bic (Bic/Total Carbon) between baseline and post treatment showed a trend in the tumor region but did not reach statistical significance (the mean value decreased in the deceased cohort from 0.03 to 0.02, and increased in the survivors from 0.025 to 0.032.
Despite these differences in right rotation and left tilt, it is important to note that, in many other measures, the differences between the groups did not reach statistical significance, although the Mézières group showed a trend towards obtaining slightly higher average values.
An overall trend toward an increase in BMI was observed at the long-term follow-up that however did not reach statistical significance due the small sample size, but in the majority of participants BMI changes were stable or improving over time [ 80 , 81 ].
Subsequent analysis of Th2-related pathways in the sEV_LPS and PBS_LPS groups showed a decreasing trend after sEV treatment, although it did not reach statistical significance, possibly due to insufficient sequencing sample size ( Supplementary Figure S4A and B—see online supplementary material for a color version of this figure).
Comparison of the three parameters between the groups also showed larger values of Top and Eslope50 and smaller values of Hill slope in the 1‐BP‐exposed groups at PND 14, with the exception of Eslope50 in the 400 ppm group that showed a trend suggestive of an increase, but did not reach statistical significance (Table 3 ).
However, PD-L1 high expression group (TPS ≥50%) showed a trend toward longer survival (n=4; mPFS =15.93 months, 95% CI: 3.13–NE) compared to PD-L1-negative patients (n=11; mPFS =5.33 months, 95% CI: 4.37–NE), though this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.39, Figure 3D ).