“a trend towards significance”

A trend towards significance ( p = 0.05) was observed with EGFR expression and bPFS.

Moreover, a trend towards significance was found for the following correlation: ∆-values of the T1w/T2w in the cerebellum/brainstem GM and CA (rho = 0.49; p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).

Correlations between the ESCoT and established tests Correlational analyses with the Holm correction for multiple comparisons showed that the ESCoT significantly correlated with the RME (r = 0.33, p <0.01) and showed a trend towards significance with the SNQ (r = 0.19, p >0.05).

The mean contribution of EGP to total glucose appearance was 15% greater with MYC, with a trend towards significance ( P = 0.05).

This is the claim that p -values between 0.05 and 0.1 indicate a trend towards significance, most commonly expressed in the rote statement “The threshold for significance was set at p ≤ 0.05, and trends were reported at p < 0.10”.

Post hoc t ‐tests demonstrate a trend towards significance following rSI stimulation on the ‘self’ task ( t 22 = 2.05, P = 0.05, Cohen's d = 0.43), but not the ‘dummy’ task ( t 22 = 0.01, P = 0.99, Cohen's d < 0.01), and no significant effects of rTPJ stimulation on either the ‘self’ ( t 22 = 1.54, P = 0.14, Cohen's d = 0.32) or ‘dummy’ task ( t 22 = 0.46, P = 0.65, Cohen's d = 0.10).

Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, with a trend towards significance defined as P = 0.05–0.08.

In contrast, for the mental component of the SF-36 (MCS), patients with a CM (41.41 ± 12.19, p =0.002) had lower scores, while the presence of an ICD showed a trend towards significance (42 ± 13.41, p =0.050) (Fig. 1 ).

PWV values exhibited a trend towards significance at T3 (P = 0.05) and T15 (P = 0.03).

Additionally, a cluster in the initial learning phase showed a trend towards significance (trials 0–5: cluster-level t = 14.21, p = 0.05), suggesting slower initial learning of the cue-target contingency with a false (volatility) prior ( Figure 3D ).

A trend towards significance (p=0.05) for increased activation of the (medial) visual network to (a group of predominantly) angry faces, and decreased deactivation (p=0.08) in the sensorimotor network in response to fearful faces in BEATVIC was observed.

Gender did not independently predict progression, yet showed a trend towards significance when added with histological grade into the multivariate model, with females more at risk than males ( P =0.05).

Insulin secretion (5.5 mM: 9.59% and 11 mM: 14%) showed a trend towards significance following treatment with both glucose concentrations ( p > 0.05).

Concerning the interrelation of cardiovascular risk factors with myocardial inflammation, only smoking was associated with myocardial inflammation in crude logistic regression analysis (OR 1.6687 [95%CI 1.113–2.500]; p = 0.013), but this association showed only a trend towards significance in the fully adjusted model (OR 1.659 [95%CI 1.000–2.753]; p = 0.050) (Table 4 , Fig. 4 ).

The odds of having a comorbid disease in the same eye as CSCR were statistically significant for branch retinal vein occlusion (OR 11.56, p -value = 0.02) and non-exudative AMD (OR 2.06; p -value = 0.01); additionally, there was a trend towards significance for idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (OR 4.43; p -value = 0.05) when compared to the eyes without CSCR.

A trend towards significance was found for the interaction effect between Time and Type of Manipulation ( F (2.11, 183.34) = 2.92, p = .05, n 2 = .03), indicating higher self-reported well-being after the condition for both intervention conditions combined (with and without verbal suggestions) compared to the control condition (see Fig 3 ).

However, there was a trend towards significance for hypertension ( p = 0.05), which has been previously demonstrated in larger case series [ 20 , 39 , 55 ].

Thus, the frequency of participants who reported performing this type of intergenerational face-to-face activities was significantly higher among female, single, or married people, and subjects living with a partner and/or other relatives, and a trend towards significance ( p = 0.050) was observed among individuals with university studies.

Although IN1 also indicates a trend towards significance, it did not reach the threshold ( p < 0.05) in this analysis, with a p-value of 0.054, indicating a less pronounced but still noteworthy difference in engagement levels.

Recently increased PAK1 expression was associated with activated AKT with a trend towards significance (p=0.05) in human squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) samples [ 128 ].

The compositional analysis revealed that 4 metabolome variables were significantly (γ: 0.32–0.44, p ≤ 0.002), and 13 variables with a trend towards significance ( p < 0.05), associated with SB with varying metabolic pathways.

Within the LA in the experimental group there was a trend towards significance during PR (t(13) = 1.94, p = 0.05), and significant effects during R1, R2, R3 and TR (ts(13)>2.41, p s<0.02).

For all analyses data were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 and were considered a trend towards significance when 0.10 ≥ P > 0.05.

While not statistically significant, there was a trend towards significance for the relationship between receiving a prescription for ezetimibe and having an appointment with a clinical pharmacist ( p = 0.05). 4.

Both correlations were classified as moderate, and respectively did not reach statistical significance ( t = 1.89, df = 7, p > 0.1) or showed a trend towards significance ( t = 2.33, df = 7, 0.1 > p > 0.05).