“a marginal trend”

21%, AOR=0.20, 95% CI 0.08-0.49, p=.01), and a marginal trend toward lower alcohol initiation between T1 and T2 (3% vs. 20%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=0.09 95% CI 0.01-1.03, p=.052).

After adjustment for age, sex, and BMI in Model 2, the negative association between tunnel length and ALPS index remained significant (β = −0.017, 95% CI: −0.028 to −0.006, p = 0.003), whereas the association for tunnel diameter showed a marginal trend (β = −0.024, 95% CI: −0.048 to 0.000, p = 0.052).

For Q3, the results indicated a marginal trend towards significance between Models E and F ( p = 0.0520), while the other comparisons showed no statistically significant differences.

Notably, T-cell exclusion exhibited a marginal trend ( p = 0.052), whereas T-cell dysfunction did not differ significantly between groups ( p = 0.638; Figure 8 B). 3.8.

In piglets, at day 7, there was a marginal trend in overall Shannon diversity ( p = 0.052).

We observed a significant reduction in cel_circ_0000438 in nova-1 mutants, while levels of cel_circ_0000439 and linear crh-1 were not significantly changed, although linear crh-1 showed a marginal trend toward reduction ( P = 0.052) ( Fig. 2b ).

Furthermore, in immunocompromised nude mice, arbutin demonstrated a marginal trend toward improved survival outcomes ( P = 0.0524) ( S3B Fig ).

In the higher garden, there was a marginal trend in the same direction in 2013 ( t 84.5 = 2.25, P = 0.053).

There was a marginal trend in risk of NHL with the number of years worked on a farm ( p = 0.053).

Furthermore, there was a marginal trend for a positive correlation between the mean number of relations mentioned by parents’ and children, r = .31, p = .053, one-sided (see Fig 3 ).

Furthermore, visceral adiposity index (VAI) and NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS) showed a marginal trend towards statistical significance, increasing in VAI and decreasing in NFS ( p = 0.053 and p = 0.063, respectively).

The ORR to first-line chemotherapy for PUC patients was 61.4%, indicating a marginal trend of significance ( P = .053) when compared with the ORR of VUC patients (45.3%).

HF-HRV showed a marginal trend ( p = .054).

In addition, the main effect of the electrode areas showed a marginal trend towards significance, F (4,80) = 3.602, p = 0.054, η p 2 = 0.153.

Only lymph node status showed a marginal trend with poor prognosis of TNBC ( p = 0.054).

There was a marginal trend toward a significant interaction effect between location and restriction period ( χ 2 (4) = 9.32, P = 0.054), driven largely by differential changes in the recruitment locations during the pandemic (Figure 4b ).

Spending more than 50% of the day outdoors showed a marginal trend toward increased odds (AOR = 2.40, 95% CI: 0.97–5.81, p = 0.054).

While a marginal trend was observed between recommendation reasons and NPS categories (p = 0.054), the association did not reach statistical significance, which may be attributable to limited sample size.

SNR = 12 dB) did not significantly affect speech recognition scores in any mask condition, although we observed a marginal trend towards significance in the KF94 mask condition ( p = 0.055). 3.2.2.

A follow-up t -test indicated that non-clustered learners showed a marginal trend toward better memory than clustered learners for the first 30 LP trials ( t (60) = 1.96, p = 0.055, Cohen’s d = 0.51, CL effect size = 64%; clustered: M = 0.57, 95% CI [0.51, 0.62]; non-clustered: M = 0.65, 95% CI [0.58, 0.72]).

There was a marginal trend toward reduced willingness with increasing age (b = −0.15, p = 0.055).

delayed recall) revealed a marginal trend in the opposite direction as predicted ( F (1,51) = 3.86, p = 0.055, η 2 < 0.001, BF incl = 0.287 ).

Jennings et al 13 found that 156 out of 465 patients underwent mastectomy, which decreased OS in a marginal trend ( P =0.055).

Results also suggested a marginal trend for more perceived losses to predict less walking (p=.055, 95% CI=[-42.85,0.42]) but to have no impact on sitting time (p=.58).

CTC Analysis at Baseline At baseline, patients with a high epithelial CTC level (≥2 CTC1E) showed a marginal trend of shorter PFS ( p = 0.055) but no significant difference for OS ( p = 0.115) compared to those with a low epithelial CTCE level (<2 CTC1E) ( Figure 3 A(i)).