“a marginal trend”

Species wing loading did not explain the training gain of the variable proportion of forest in the models ( F 1,5 = 5.53, p = 0.066) nor the summed training gain of all forest variables, although there was a marginal trend (F 1,5 = 6.20, p = 0.055; Fig. 3 b).

CTC Analysis at Baseline At baseline, patients with a high epithelial CTC level (≥2 CTC1E) showed a marginal trend of shorter PFS ( p = 0.055) but no significant difference for OS ( p = 0.115) compared to those with a low epithelial CTCE level (<2 CTC1E) ( Figure 3 A(i)).

SNR = 12 dB) did not significantly affect speech recognition scores in any mask condition, although we observed a marginal trend towards significance in the KF94 mask condition ( p = 0.055). 3.2.2.

No significant differences were observed for C1, C2, C4, and C5 ( P > 0.05), while C3 showed a marginal trend ( P = 0.0556).

There was a marginal trend toward fewer words per sentence in AI-assisted messages compared to the write-alone messages, t (540) = −1.92, p = 0.056.

A marginal trend toward sexual dimorphism was also observed (F 1,49 = 3.84, p = 0.056), suggesting a propensity for higher values in females, though this did not reach the threshold for statistical significance.

However, no significant RAEs were found among defenders ( p = 0.13, ID = 1.27), while forwards showed no significant RAEs but presented a marginal trend ( p = 0.056, ID = 1.38).

A marginal trend was observed for greater intraoperative blood transfusion (adjusted p = 0.056) ( Table 3 ).

A marginal trend suggested that in Spain HoH skilled readers scored lower than HoH less-skilled readers ( b = −1.05, SE = 0.55, z = −1.91, p = .056).

Session lengths were on average longer among participants in lower-HPI neighborhoods, with a marginal trend ( P = .056), which could reflect greater discussion of contextual barriers; however, this should be interpreted cautiously.

The pooled OR for hypertension was not significant, and the pooled risk ratio (RR) also did not reach significance but showed a marginal trend (RR = 1.37, p = 0.057).

A marginal trend was noted where standard stocking tended to increase GLR within enriched aquaria (V vs × 2 V) by 0.066 units ( p = 0.057).

Bonferroni-adjusted simple effects showed no significant group differences for any individual emotion when covariates were held at their means (ERQ_Sup = 4.0522, ERQ_Cog = 4.8276, MoCA = 27.885), although anger retained a marginal trend (Δ = −0.309, p = 0.057).

Although there was a marginal trend for increased Ntcp1 mRNA in BAE mice ( p = 0.057) suggesting a higher hepatic bile acid clearance from the portal vein, there was no apparent effect on genes involved in the canalicular secretion to the biliary duct ( Bsep, Abcg8, Abcc2 ), export of bile acids to the circulation ( Abcc3, Abcc4 ) or Fxr in the liver.

There was a marginal trend in favor of BASIS-T such that intervention fidelity remained steady for BASIS-T while worsening for the AC condition (Est = − 0.191, p = 0.057).

A marginal trend toward a protective effect of increasing pollen concentration on sensitization was noted only in the lower-exposure stratum (OR = 0.994, 95% CI: 0.989–1.000, P = 0.058), which did not reach statistical significance ( Supplementary Table 2 ).

Although the Kruskal–Wallis test indicated significant intergroup variation in GCS categories across seasons ( p = 0.005), subsequent Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons identified no specific significant differences, despite a marginal trend between autumn and winter (adjusted p = 0.058).

Resection margin status showed a marginal trend with TSR in the overall cohort ( p = 0.058): margin-negative resections were 35/37 (94.6%) in the TSR < 13% group versus 37/47 (78.7%) in the TSR ≥13% group.

A marginal trend toward apathy was observed ( p =0.058).

When the three individual hard outcomes were combined, there was a marginal trend toward lower composite event rates in the transradial group {2.5% vs. 3.8%, (95% CI 0.49-1.01), p=0.058}. 6) The large cohort data from 593,094 procedures in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (606 sites; 2004 to 2007) were compared to the procedural success rate between TFI and TRI.

In this limited subset, PCE scores showed a marginal trend toward change over the same period ( p = 0.058) (Figure S4), in contrast to the stability observed in Dr.

The analysis underlying these conclusions was not presented, but the statistical results presented in the full study report ( Hazleton Laboratories 1983 ) support the interpretation of these data as indicative of a marginal trend (trend p -value = 0.058) with statistically significant increases in three of the four dose groups ( p = 0.071, 0.023, 0.019, and 0.036 for the 50, 125, 185, and 250 mg/kg/day dose groups, respectively).

Moreover, a marginal trend towards significance (r = 0.242, p = 0.058) was observed between the IL-31 serum level and itch intensity.

The analysis revealed a marginal trend in the supragranular layer ( p = 0.058) and a significant difference in the infragranular layer ( p = 0.029), whereas the granular layer did not show a significant deviation ( p = 0.62).

Multiple linear regression revealed that while CCT showed a marginal trend toward affecting PNCT measurements after controlling for GAT (P = 0.059), the effect size was clinically negligible (β = 0.008 mmHg per 1 μm increase in CCT).