“a marginal trend”

In contrast, CT showed a marginal trend toward reducing arterial stiffness (SMD = − 0.39, 95% CI: − 0.79 to 0.00, P = 0.05), although the evidence was not sufficiently robust to support a clear effect (Fig. 3 ).

MA Group A significant association revealed between the PRDM16 rs2651899 and the MA subgroup group for the CC genotype (FE model OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.12–1.74; p -value = 0.003) and a marginal trend for a protective effect of the AA genotype (FE model OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.66–1.00; p -value = 0.05).

Interventions were more frequent in non-survivors, including invasive mechanical ventilation ( P <0.001), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR; P <0.001), and continuous renal replacement therapy ( P <0.001), while vasoactive drug use showed a marginal trend ( P =0.050).

Short-chain fatty acids The total fecal SCFA concentrations and the concentrations of propionate and butyrate increased significantly from D0 to D90 ( P = 0.04, 0.03, 0.03, respectively), while acetate concentrations showed a marginal trend but did not reach statistical significance ( P = 0.05).

At the individual-variable level, only burnout (F = 4·40, p = 0·04, η2 = 0·08) and a marginal trend for social support (F = 3·95, p = 0·05, η2 = 0·08) were associated with cortisol.

At 3 d post-challenge, while the Shannon index showed a marginal trend ( P = 0.05), the Simpson index indicated significant variation in community evenness ( P < 0.05).

However, when testing the pre-post change in stance slopes within each political orientation, we found no reliable shift: left-leaning outlets showed no change (Δβ = 0.01, SE = 0.03, p = 0.85), and right-leaning outlets showed only a marginal trend of rising support (Δβ = 0.09, SE = 0.03, p = 0.05) that did not survive Holm–Bonferroni correction.

A marginal trend of alignment with this cluster was noted for those in periurban areas (OR 6.82, 95% CI 0.99-47.10; P =.05).

First, digital game addiction tendency was negatively but non-significantly related to self-regulation, showing only a marginal trend (p ≈ .05).

IVF Success Rates Despite a marginal trend towards significance ( p = 0.05), the implantation rate (17.3% vs. 23.6%) and the live birth rate per cycle (16.1% vs. 23.2%) were comparable between the endometriosis and the control groups.

However, the decrease in the mean serum levels of FBG showed a marginal trend toward significant (199.72±81.10 vs 163.68±75.88 mg/dl; p = 0.05) ( Table 3 ).

For the SRS rated by teachers, there were no differences between the groups on the percentages of clinical responders at endpoint and follow-up, although the difference at endpoint showed a marginal trend towards significance, with a higher percentage in the PRT + robot group compared with the other groups ( χ 2 (2) = 5.75, p = 0.050).

Fasting C-peptide levels showed a marginal trend toward higher values on the day of pelemir-enriched bread consumption (median: 2.1 [0.7–7.1] ng/mL vs. 2.0 [0.6–4.1] ng/mL; p = 0.051).

Changes in rsFC from baseline to the 8‐week time point were negatively correlated with HAMD score reductions at 8‐week time point after correction (rho = −0.490, p = 0.002), with a marginal trend at the 2‐week time point (rho = −0.354, p = 0.051), suggesting that changes in rsFC coincided with improvement of clinical symptoms.

Type of school was once again significant (B = −0.056, p < 0.001), and teaching specialty showed a marginal trend (B = 0.013, p = 0.051).

In addition, no interactions were statistically significant (Table S3 A), although the interaction between phase, concentration, and identity showed a marginal trend (F2,29 = 3.30, P = 0.051).

However, BMI showed a marginal trend, with each unit increase associated with a 7.6% higher risk of complications (hazard ratio [HR], 1.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.000–1.158; p = 0.051).

In the autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto‐HSCT)‐fit subgroup, OS was more favourable in the order early metabolic responders, delayed metabolic responders, and non‐metabolic responders, with a marginal trend toward statistical significance (HR 3·41, P = 0·051), and PFS was significantly superior in early metabolic responders (HR 4·43, P = 0·002).

Period showed a marginal trend ( p = 0.051), suggesting modest fatigue or practice effects, whereas sequence was not significant, F (3, 350) = 1.42, p = 0.236, with an unsystematic pattern across positions.

Decomposition of the interactions revealed a marginal trend in which individuals high in RWA evaluated the highly competent political candidate more positively ( b = 0.29, SE = 0.15, p = .051) and reported a higher likelihood of voting for him (b = 4.61, SE = 2.64, p = .082) compared to the neutral political candidate.

Whereas infants and apes both pointed more frequently towards the other side when the reward was located there (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 45.0, N = 9, p = .004; apes: T + = 59.5, N = 11, p = .018), only infants exhibited a marginal trend to direct more pointing gestures towards the other side when the experimenter was attentive (Wilcoxon signed-ranks test; infants: T + = 39.0, N = 9, p = .051; apes: T + = 40.0, N = 11, p = .544).

Effects of the BDI-II and Manipulations on the ASQ-GEN Another moderated regression analysis on the ASQ-GEN (Time 2) revealed a significant MODE × BDI-II interaction term ( β = .21, p = .02) and the FOCUS × BDI-II interaction also showed a marginal trend ( β = .18, p = .051) after controlling for the baseline ASQ-GEN (Table 2 ).

Between T0 and T1, reductions in BoP and mPI were significant (both p < 0.001), whereas the decrease in PPD showed a marginal trend ( p = 0.051).

Similarly, anterior circulation ICS was not significantly associated with changes in Aβ deposition; however, a marginal trend toward greater Aβ deposition over the 4‐year period was observed ( p = 0.051).

Fluoroquinolone Use: A marginal trend was observed for fluoroquinolone use (β = 0.6752, p = 0.0518), but this did not reach statistical significance.