The inter annual total case count difference was highly significant (F 11,132 : 36.305, p < 0001).
Excerpts
The Spearman rank correlation between the two variables was −0.88 and highly significant (p<0.0001).
−2.1 ± 5.5; p < 0.005), the relationship between change in cg05575921 and change was present and highly significant for both those who managed to fully quit smoking ( p < 0.0001; adjusted R 2 = 0.62) as well as those who attempted to quit smoking ( p < 0.0001; adjusted R 2 = 0.70). 4.
Results: The experimental group post-intervention for static balance, dynamic balance, and postural control tests showed extremely significant improvement with a p-value of <0.0001.
Results: The difference in scores at all the 3 stations before and after the intervention and also global scores before and after the intervention was statistically highly significant ( P = 0.0001).
Highly significant associations between BCS and pregnancy status ( P < 0.0001) and BCS and cyclicity status ( P < 0.0001) were observed in this study.
The decrease was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001). 3.1.1.2.
We noted poor agreement between lipoarabinomannan lateral flow assay and ELISA for all lateral flow assay band intensity cutoff points ( figure 3 ); however, we recorded a clear trend for increased likelihood of a positive ELISA test with increased intensity of bands on lateral flow assay (p<0·0001).
Highly significant positive association was recorded with Wolbachia studies (β = 7.09, SE = 0.770, p < 0.0001, 95%CI [5.590, 8.607]) and significantly negative association (β = −2.772, SE = 0.864, CI [−4.466, −1.079], p = 0.0013) was recorded with samples size.
Tubulointerstitial TG2 showed highly significant positive linear correlations with plasma concentrations of creatinine (r 2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001), urea (r 2 = 0.81, P < 0.0001) and phosphate (r 2 = 0.76, P < 0.0001).
ANOVA RM showed there was no effect of Day ( F (4, 20) = 0.248, p = 0.908) or Day*Trial interaction ( F (12, 60) = 0.788, p = 0.661), but a highly significant main effect of Trial ( F (3, 15) = 17.73, p < 0.0001), upon the slope.
The p -value represented the level of significance of the data, with p ≤ 0.05 (*) considered significant, p ≤ 0.01 ** as very significant, p ≤ 0.001 *** as highly significant, and p < 0.0001 (****) as most significant. 3.
To visualise the results, we plotted the 34 network edges between the TF nodes with highly significant correlations ( P <0.0001; Fig. 5 ).
Although the additive effect of FW7 was highly significant in the S 2 family ( p < 0.0001 ), the resistance of individuals homozygous for the favorable FW7 allele and unfavorable FW6 allele ( y ̄ = 1.80 ) was weaker than that observed among individuals homozygous for the favorable FW6 allele ( y ̄ = 1.05 ).
This baseline log-ratio was highly significant (p < 0.0001) in the model.
Consistent with previous findings reporting limited dosage compensation in the homogametic avian male, the total proportion of genes on the Z-chromosome that showed lower expression in females was highly significant in both RJF ( Figure 1 ; 87% was lower in females, χ 2 = 275.8, p<0.0001) and WL (90% was lower in females, χ 2 = 312.2 p<0.0001) compared to a 50/50 distribution.
Two-way ANOVA with dose and exposure time as main factors yielded a highly significant main effect of concentration (F = 30.99, p < 0.0001), and a small effect of exposure time (F = 3.06, p = 0.0828), but the interaction term was highly significant (F = 4.5, p = 0.0009).
These gradients were highly significant ( P < 0.0001), independent of malignancy and robust to neighbourhoods of diverse radii (Extended Data Fig. 3g,h ).
The analysis of variance of the response surface revealed that the model was extremely significant ( p < 0.0001), the lack of fit was not significant ( p > 0.05), the correlation coefficient R 2 was 0.9816, and the adjusted determination coefficients R adj 2 was 0.9632 ( Table 2 ).
This reward benefit effect on latency was highly significant ( F (2,53) = 35.855, p < 0.0001), amounting 31 ms for young adults ( F (1,17) = 13.95, p < 0.002), 30 ms for healthy elderly ( F (1,17) = 6.428, p < 0.022), and 28 ms for PD patients ( F (1,19) = 15.226, p < 0.001).
Highly significant ( p < .0001) correlation was seen (R 2 = .998) for the obtained index S/C values (9.10–1.73) against the log 2 ‐transformed dilution series ( Figure S1 ), indicating that some quantitation is possible with the Abbott CMIA.
Ground truth and MREyeTrack estimations were compared using linear regression analysis and yielded highly significant results (all p < 0.0001; Fig. 3 D ).
The overall effect of the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), indicating that NH 4 + , K + , NO 3 − , BAP, and NAA significantly affected growth.
gallinae infection with artificially bred, captive columbiform birds (racing feral pigeons and ring doves) was highly significant ( P < 0.0001) in comparison with free-living columbiform birds (urban and rural feral pigeons, wood pigeons and collared doves) (55/58 vs. 17/41, respectively).
Heterogeneity on the full dataset was highly significant by the Cochran test ( Q = 29822.77, df = 975, p < 0.0001).