As expected, a highly significant difference (p < 0.0001) was observed between the activity of the unmutated AS and CS minimal promoters in NFS-5 (Figure 2 B) and 18–81 (Figure 2 C) cells, while vector containing only the kappa enhancer exhibited little activity.
Excerpts
The difference between the groups for all parameters was statistically highly significant (P<.0001, for all parameters).
Patients with bone pain at study inclusion demonstrated a distinct bone-centric disease pattern, characterized by highly significant increases in osteolytic lesions with structural instability risk (25% vs. 11%, p = 0.0001) and higher prevalence of CRAB-B already present at ID (90% vs. 78%, p = 0.003).
To visualise the results, we plotted the 34 network edges between the TF nodes with highly significant correlations ( P <0.0001; Fig. 5 ).
Indeed, patients with a high LSC17 score were less likely to achieve MRD-negative remission regardless of the treatment regimen received, although this did not reach statistical significance in the smaller group of patients treated with FLAG-Ida ( Online Supplementary Table S5 ; 30/52 [58%] vs . 54/59 [92%]; P <0.0001 for 7+3; 8/18 [44%] vs . 9/11 [82%]; P =0.06 for FLAG-Ida).
The cross correlation between total 25(OH)D and DBP was also highly significant (r 0.84–0.92; all P < 0.0001) but the lag times were less consistent, varying between 0 and 3 h, compared to cross correlation between DBP and total 1,25(OH) 2 D.
The results demonstrated a highly significant differences ( p < 0.0001) among the study districts for HBU, HW, BL, and TP.
High correlation values were evident, with Spearman coefficients of 0.947 for gait speed and 0.989 for stride length, both highly significant ( p < 0.0001) as demonstrated in Figure 7 and Figure 8 .
The difference in spatial selectivity between the two brain areas was highly significant ( p < 0.0001).
arnfieldi infection, with statistical analysis showing a highly significant variation ( p < 0.0001).
This contrast turned out to be highly significant, F (1,78) = 3,298.45, p < 0.0001.
However, the results were found to be statistically highly significant when correlation was done between knowledge, attitude, and practices ( p < 0.0001).
The interaction between the polishing system and speed was extremely significant ( P < 0.0001).
This difference was highly significant (p < 10 −4 , Kolmogorov–Smirnov test).
Also, a log–log regression of TD on D is highly significant ( t =–10.63, 38 df, P <0.0001).
The change in IOP over the three-month observation period was highly significant ( P < 0.0001 by t -test).
All such expression differences were highly significant (p<1e-4) after Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction for the multiplicity of the test [ 55 ].
During SMC differentiation of A404 cells, 72 (55.4%) of these genes showed significant differential regulation, pathway over-representation that was highly significant by Fisher's Exact Test (p<0.0001).
Those shifts ranged from a modest four-percentage-point increase in support of legalization to a substantial 12-point jump in the share who said it us “safe for pit bulls to live in residential neighborhoods.” The differences in percentages from 2014 to 2018 for the first three questions in Figure 1 are all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the four-point difference in support for legalization shown in the final column of the figure is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).
At the Lönnstorp site, genotypic variance was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for all traits except NS and SL ( Supplementary Table S2 ).
28 We also detected a highly significant association between the ECG interpretation knowledge of nurses and their educational qualifications (p < 0.0001), which differs from the results of another study, which reported no association between the knowledge of nurses and their professional qualifications. 29 Moreover, we found a highly sign
Across the 17 clones, there was a highly significant correlation between the levels of E7 and total E6 transcripts per cell ( p < 0.0001) (Figure 2C ).
This corresponded with highly significant (MM200, Me4405, Mel-RM p < 0.0001, Sk-mel-28 p = 0.0008) increases in XPC mRNA expression in all cell lines (1.27-7.93 fold increase) (Fig. 1b ).
The difference of -4.0 points was statistically highly significant (p < 0.0001), suggesting a potentially clinically relevant improvement.
Thus, we calculated that the likelihood of 15 consecutive successes (= correct identification of slides) was (l/2) 15 = 6.1 × 10 -5 , which means that the result is highly significant (p < 0.0001) and unlikely to consequence of chance.