Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
SNVs showing highly significant association ( p < 0.0001) mapped to pathways related to neuronal signaling, axon guidance, neural cell adhesion molecule interactions and acetylation, extracellular matrix (ECM) organization, olfactory signaling, Rho-GTPase cycle, and G- α signaling events ( Supplementary Figure S1 ).
extremely significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualified
Statistically, extremely significant difference was observed between the prewash and postwash at RT sperm DNA fragmentation mean percentage values ( t = 5.169, P < 0.0001), similarly statistically significant difference was observed between the prewash and postwash at 37°C sperm DNA fragmentation mean percentage values ( t = 5.090, P < 0.0001).
highly significantp<.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A simple regression of ranks of male participants and female participants in the couples’ group showed a highly significant positive relationship, R = .997, Y = 0.14+0.97, F(1,6) = 105.7, p<.0001, confirming that the preference for the different morphs were nearly identical for both sexes.
Is beauty in the face of the beholder?
PLoS One · 2013 · PMC3707967
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
2004 ). Highly significant correlations in PSE were found between Drosophila species (Pearson correlation, r = 0.63, P < 0.0001; r = 0.66, P < 0.0001; and r = 0.54, P < 0.0001 for sim , sec , and pse , respectively; table 5 ).
Transcription start site evolution in Drosophila.
Mol Biol Evol · 2013 · PMC3708499
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Rat control on the farm A highly significant difference (χ 2 = 33.4543 p < 0.0001) was observed in the number of T. gondii positive animals among the properties that use cats for rat control (n = 239; 20 positive animals; prevalence 1.73%) and those that do not use them (n = 885; 12 positive 1 animals; prevalence 1.03%).
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Statistical analysis confirmed a highly significant positive correlation between IGS size and 45S rDNA consensus length (Spearman’s ρ = 0.937, p < 0.0001), providing strong evidence that IGS expansion may be the primary driver of variation in 45S rDNA unit length across Characiformes species.