Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Comparing methods, the improvement in correlation to logarithm concentration of ln C obs ( t ) and ln C Model ( t ) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) for Tk-GV functions compared to the E1 functions using paired samples t -testing of the z -values from z = atanh( r ).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The correlation of the DEC1-dependent signature was highly significant with the CD28-regulated gene list (P < 0.0001). 72% of the genes up-regulated by DEC1 were also up-regulated by CD28 co-stimulation, whereas 83% of the DEC1 down-regulated genes were again down-regulated by CD28 signaling ( Fig. 7, C and D , top).
highly significantP < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Is There Co‐Ordinated Anatomical Change across the CCN? Partial correlation analysis, controlling for age and gender across the regions of the CCN were highly significant ( P < 0.0001) between bilateral dACC nodes, bilateral inferior frontal and left mid frontal nodes of the DLPFC and bilateral inferior and superior parietal nodes of the DPC.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Expression patterns of hsa-miR-181c and hsa-let-7c KRAS expression exhibited a highly significant, genotype-driven escalation across rs712 and rs9266 variants (p < 0.0001), revealing a clear molecular gradient: WT carriers maintained minimal KRAS expression, whereas HT patients displayed a dramatic surge the highest observed followed by a substantial, though slightly lower, increase in HM.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
LVEF ≤ 0.45 was the single independent and highly significant predictor of early CHF among other clinical and echocardiographic variables (odds ratio 17.0; [95% CI 4.1 - 70.8]; p < 0.0001).
showed a trendp<0.00010.0× alpha
Results SPT showed a trend towards a decrease in the wheal surface area (mean in mm 2 B0 vs mean R1, p value; vs mean R2, p value): EW 97.5 vs 38.0, p<0.0001; vs 36.3, p<0.001; EY 33.5 vs 12.4 p<0.0001; vs 12.3, p=0.003; OVA 55.6 vs 19.1 p<0.0001; vs 17.3, p<0.001; OVM 109.6 vs 56.9, p=0.005; vs 44.8, p=0.000.
highly significantp < 0.00010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Osmotic stressed and seed priming with chitosan were found to be significant in terms of CGR (crop growth rate) ( p < 0.0461); likewise, the LAR (leaf area ratio) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), PMC (percent moisture content) shows a high level of significance ( p < 0.001), MET (mean emergence time) showed significant values ( p < 0.0001), SVI (seed vigor index) showed non-significant values ( p < 0.0551), and the values of CVG (coefficient of velocity of germination) and TGI (Timson germination index) showed a significant difference ( p < 0.001). 3.2.