Another risk factor duration of exposure, indicated highly significant ( P <0.0001) increase in the odds ratio (OR: 6.28; 95% CI: 2.68–14.73) when the exposure duration is high as compared to moderate.
Excerpts
Permutation tests (see the “Methods” section) indicated that observing 15 concordant features is statistically highly significant, exceeding all 10,000 random permutations ( p < 0.0001, Fig. 8b ).
To compare multiple independent groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used, which showed highly significant statistical differences ( p < 0.0001) for all the kinetic and morphological parameters studied.
There was a highly significant correlation between circulating in vivo HI and MN antibody titers and survival (p < 0001).
Mixed‐effects ANOVA analysis showed a significant effect of time ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,140 = 13.02), no significant effect of the genotype ( ns P = 0.1975, F 1,10 = 1.906), no significant genotype × treatment interaction ( ns P = 0.1926, F 1,10 = 1.952) and highly significant time × genotype × treatment interaction ( **** P < 0.0001, F 14,110 = 4.085; Figure 3C,D ).
This increase was highly significant (p<0.0001).
Additional statistically highly significant decreases in activity were observed at position -17 (Mfe I, p < 0.0001) and +101 (Nar I, p < 0.0001) [Fig. 1C ].
According to Table 3 , the ANOVA for the response surface quadratic regression model showed that the model was highly significant ( p < 0.0001) with a very high F -value (211.56 and 253.50).
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test yielded a highly significant result ( P < 0.0001), demonstrating a significant difference in histological scores between the jejunum and ileum, suggesting a potential systematic variation in lesion scoring across different intestinal segments.
This difference is highly significant ( t = −4.41, p < 0.0001) and depends on the fact that differences between motor patterns resulted very salient, whereas it was more difficult to distinguish hand postures.
The correlation between these two variates was highly significant ( r = 0.91, p <0.0001), indicating that the MGC-PNs' bursting property was predictive of their responsiveness – the higher the burstiness, the stronger the response.
In Col-0, all six mutants showed significantly lower bacterial load than WT, with highly significant differences observed for all strains after FDR correction (all P < 0.0001).
The NRI was highly significant ( P = .0001) for the ADNI cohort but was not significant ( P = .09) for the Bryan-ADRC cohort ( Table 2 ).
After adding MTM constructs, the final model remained highly significant (F = 11.12, p < 0.0001) with an adjusted R 2 = 0.5151, indicating that 51.5% of the variance in initiation was explained.
For Ireland, the difference is not significant ( P ∼10%), but for Denmark it is P ∼0.2%, and for the larger continental countries, the (negative) difference is highly significant ( P <0.01%).
domesticus sub-species ( Table S2 ) based on highly significant discrimination of the modern sympatric species (MANOVA, Wilk’s Lambda = 0.087, df1 = 13, df2 = 26, F = 20.78, P <0.0001).
The survival curves displayed a clear stepwise separation, where participants in the highest quartiles (Q4) consistently exhibited the steepest decline in hypertension-free probability compared to those in the lowest quartiles (Q1), with log-rank tests revealing highly significant differences for all indices ( p < 0.0001).
tabaci demonstrated a moderate but highly significant preference (65.1% [p < 0.0001]; 67.3% [p < 0.0001]; and 65.9% [p = 0.0008]) toward the 10, 25, and 50 mM sucrose solutions, respectively ( Figure 1 C).
Highly significant effects ( p < 0.0001) of Hd1 and Ghd7 on HD were detected in all the three trials ( Table 1 ).
This effect was not seen in Ewing's sarcoma; ch14.18/CHO had minimal cytotoxicity at the same concentration against Ewing's sarcoma irrespective of GD2 expression; the difference between the killing of Kelly or LAN1 and GD2 bright DC-ES6, was highly significant ( p =<0.0001).
Evaluation by the Fischer’s exact test revealed that only the affected (n = 12) and not the unaffected twins (n = 0) had autoantibodies against the systemic autoantigen targets, and this difference was highly significant (P < 0.0001).
Pearson's correlations (one-tailed test) between domains for the total sample were strong, positive, and highly significant ( P < 0.0001), ranging from 0.46 (physical versus social) to 0.67 (physical versus psychological).
This difference was highly significant (p < 0.0001).
Similarly, the number of radiation exposures was less in group I(WH) (3.52) as compared to group II(WH) (7.1) which was statistically extremely significant ( P = 0.0001).
Histograms indicated a highly significant increase in mean NAVs after stimulation with 2 or 10 nM iloprost ( p < 0.0001) for those phosphopeptides with PKA consensus site versus no such site (Suppl.