Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP -value ≤ 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Briefly, meta-analyses were considered to be supported by robust evidence if the association was supported by more than 1000 cases, a highly significant association (the random effects model had a P -value ≤ 10 −6 , a threshold that is considered to substantially reduce false positive findings) [ 31 – 33 ], there was absence of high heterogeneity based on I 2 < 50%, the 95% PI excluded the null value, and there was no evidence of small-study effects or excess statistical significance.
highly significantP < 1 × 10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
A highly significant positive correlation ( R = 0.43, P < 1 × 10 −6 ) between CHK1 and ZEB1 was observed in these breast carcinomas, in which 69% (89 of 129) of the tumors with high ZEB1 expression exhibited high CHK1 expression, and 77% (47 of 61) of the tumors with low ZEB1 expression showed low CHK1 expression ( Fig. 8b ).
an increasing trendp < 0.0000010.0× alphagold
The mortality rate for NH white group also demonstrated an increasing trend from 0.132 to 0.196 from 1999 to 2001 (APC: 22.3406; 95% CI, 4.4622 to 39.741; p < 0.000001), with a rise to 0.286 in the mortality rate from 2001 to 2018 (APC: 2.8652; 95% CI, −3.0608 to 3.5123; p = 0.119176), followed by an increase to 0.414 from 2018 till 2022 (APC: 10.7260; 95% CI, 5.725 to 20.0315; p < 0.000001).
highly significantP<10 −60.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Box 1 Umbrella review evidence rating by strength of association Convincing Highly significant associations (P<10 −6 ) Cases of n >1000 I 2 <50% 95% prediction intervals excluding the null value Largest study nominally significant (P<0.05) No evidence of small study effects No evidence of excess significance bias Highly suggestive Highly significant associations (P<10 −6 ) Cases n >1000 Larg