Barely Significant

Excerpts

514,629 sentences

highly significantP = 4.8e-070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Wilcoxon rank-test between TP datasets (Arabidopsis and non-Arabidopsis) were not observed to be significant while Wilcoxon rank test between non-Arabidopsis FN and TP datasets were observed to be highly significant (Wilcoxon rank test P = 4.8e-07 for Arabidopsis and for non-Arabidopsis datasets).
highly significantP =4.8 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Cross-correlations, in SDI_local, between the two populations were positive at all 22 chromosomes considered (range in r =0.05–0.999; median r =0.668; Supplementary Table 1 ). A sign test on all 22 correlations being positive is highly significant ( P =4.8 × 10 −7 , assuming a null expectation of a correlation being equally likely to be positive or negative).
highly significantp = 4.9×10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Synaptic transmission (SyT) ( Figure 3B , Table 5 ) was a highly significant sub-family of nervous system development and function (34 molecules, 23.3% of parent function; p = 4.9×10 −7 ) sharing 10 common genes with Ngs ( CNR1 , SHC3 , NLGN1 , ADRB2 , CACNA1A , CNP , and MPZ were elevated and TNF , FGF2 , and IL1B were suppressed by FD).
approaching significanceP <5 × 10 −70.0× alphagold
18 This well-powered meta-analysis produced one genetic variant of genome-wide significance (cholinergic receptor, nicotinic, alpha 5, CHRNA5 SNP rs2036527, P <5 × 10 −8 ), several additional variants that were approaching significance ( P <5 × 10 −7 ) and many variants that fell short of statistical significance for the prediction of cigarettes smoked per day.
highly significantp = 5 × 10 −70.0× alphaqualifiedgold
In the two large UK control samples, for example, there was a highly significant ( p = 5 × 10 −7 , using an exact implementation of the Cochran–Armitage trend test) difference in allele frequencies between UK1 (recruited exclusively in Scotland) and UK2 (recruited throughout the UK), which made us consider the possibility that this variant showed variation in allele frequency along the south–north cline as previously described in the WTCCC study and others [ 16 , 23 – 26 ].
highly significantp = 5.07e-070.0× alphaqualifiedgold
When analyzing the results by APL1A allele, only the APL1A 2 allele displayed a consistent protective effect, because the global silencing of all APL1A alleles caused a highly significant increase of infection prevalence only among carriers of the APL1A 2 allele ( p = 5.07e-07; Table 1 ).