Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantqualifiedgold
Functional analysis of the differentially expressed mRNAs In evaluating the top differentially expressed mRNAs (n = 250), we found a highly significant enrichment for several functional annotations (Supplemental Fig. 5 ), including acetylation (genes post-translationally modified by the attachment of at least one acetyl group; n = 85 genes; Fold enrichment = 2.2; Bonferroni-adjusted p = 4.2 × 10 −11 ), mitochondrion (the site of tissue respiration
In the multivariable-adjusted model, those in quartile 3 had lower odds of severe DR or worse versus the combined no DR and minimal-moderate DR categories, than those in quartile 1 (OR, 0.35; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.74; P = 0.006; per categorical increase in severity Model 2 in Table 2 ), and a significant trend for increasing frequency of fish consumption (P-trend = 0.024).
The results concerning the female hind legs can be summarized as follows: i) only the cortical bone of the tibiae was responsive to the SIT and showed alterations in the Cs.Th., ii) these alterations included a transient and not quite significant decrease after four weeks of SIT, iii) a very significant increase after eight weeks of SIT with iii) changes occurred at both, endosteal and periosteal surfaces with an emphasis on the distal half of the tibiae.
Beta-diversity analysis Average beta-diversity values were similar among years for the whole community (arithmetic mean ± SE: 0.419 ± 0.059 for 1997; 0.467 ± 0.070 for 2005; 0.444 ± 0.043 for 2012) and for the stygobiotic species (0.526 ± 0.065 for 1997; 0.632 ± 0.072 for 2005; 0.633 ± 0.049 for 2012; difference between 1997 and 2012 is in fact marginally significant), whereas increased significantly after the earthquake for the non-stygobites (0.340 ± 0.048 for 1997; 0.323 ± 0.044 for 2005; 0.535 ± 0.043 for 2012) (Table 3 ).
The results of the current study showed a decreasing trend of the constituent ratio of Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 in the PA3 group and an increasing trend in the constituent ratio of Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4 in the PA1 and PA2 groups; no significant difference was shown in the distribution of AIP quartiles between the PA1 and PA2 groups.