Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
Based on our a priori hypothesis that the left amygdala would be more involved in the sustained processing of the incongruent threat cue (the longer exposure of direct-gaze fear), we conducted a planned comparison to compare the longer exposure of direct-gaze fear with any other conditions and observed a marginally significant effect ( t (22) = 1.70, p = 0.093).
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
Next, we conducted a two-way repeated measures ANOVA on the I A values, with the condition (three movement-focused conditions) and tapping finger as independent variables, revealing a significant main effect of condition (F 2,30 = 8.10, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.351) and a marginally significant main effect of tapping finger (F 3,45 = 2.27, p = 0.093, η p 2 = 0.131); they also showed a significant interaction (F 6,90 = 11.29, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.429).
a negative trendP = 0.0941.9× alphagold
Metal(loid) concentration and plastic presence Fairy prion metal(loid) concentration and plastic presence We found no significant difference ( P > 0.05) across any of the examined liver metal(loid) concentration between plastic ingesting and non-plastic ingesting fairy prions, although Fe showed a negative trend (Table 1 , U = 96, P = 0.094).
tendency toward significanceP = 0.0941.9× alphagold
\end{document} Change in logMAR VA = 0.64 - 0.0083 ± 0.0038 × Age - 0.00070 ± 0.00027 × preoperative CRT ( AICc = 1.2 ) Univariate analyses suggested that SUKIMA was significantly associated with preoperative Mave (r = 0.613, p = 0.00015) and the improvement of Mave (r = 0.470, P = 0.0058), while a tendency toward significance was observed between SUKIMA and postoperative Mave (r = 0.296, P = 0.094; linear regression analysis, Fig. 3 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0941.9× alphagold
There was a main effect of orthographic similarity, such that high orthographic similarity led to longer reaction times (M = 445.84, SD = 102.99) than low similarity (M = 428.83, SD = 98.29), F 1 (1, 54) = 12.078, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.183 (marginally significant by stimulus, F 2 (1, 196) = 2.840, p = 0.094, η p 2 = 0.014).
showed a trendp = 0.0951.9× alpha
When comparing OLP with DBP we found that OLP was superior to DBP with respect to TNSS (12 h, Z = − 2.68, p = 0.007, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.021, r = 0.41; TNSS 2 weeks, p > 0.10) and showed a trend for significance for CSMS (12 h, Z = − 1.67, p = 0.095, corrected p > 0.10, r = 0.26; 2 weeks, Z = − 1.80, p = 0.073, corrected p > 0.10, r = 0.28) (RQLQ, p > 0.10).
nearly significantp = 0.0951.9× alphagold
The trend of having moderate activity grade (A ≥ 2) was higher in patients carrying Mx1 rs464397 C allele (p = 0.015) and Mx1 rs469390 G allele (p = 0.003); while it was lower in patients carrying OAS1 rs2285934 A allele (p = 0.026), OAS2 rs1293762 A allele (p = 0.002), and it was nearly significant for OAS3 rs2010604 C allele (p = 0.095).