Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0911.8× alphagold
Overall, the effect of group on age was marginally significant (p = 0.091, Supplementary Table S1 ), but post hoc t-tests (corrected for multiple comparisons) showed participants with anosmia were significantly older than their counterparts with normosmia ( p < 0.05, Fig. 1 .) In total more men participated (25 women, 38 men); however, there were more women (10) than men (6) with hyposmia (Fig. 1 .), with a marginally significant effect of group on gender (p = 0.097, Supplementary Table S1 ).
a decreasing trendp = 0.09161.8× alphagold
We observed that over the course of 5 days, LiveSpo DIA30 treatment led to a significant decrease in IL-17 and IL-23 (by 26.62% and 25.13%, with p values of 0.0178 and 0.0256, respectively), a 19.09% ( p = 0.038) reduction in TNF-α signaling and a decreasing trend in IL-6 (8.54%; p = 0.0916) (Fig. 3 A-D).
approaching significancep = 0.09181.8× alphagold
The % DNA in tail reached 13.4 ± 0.4% (95% CI: 12.6–14.2, p = 0.0918, approaching significance) and tail moment 1.2 ± 0.17 (95% CI: 0.87–1.53, p = 0.0274), with the tail moment being significantly higher than the control’s 0.59 ± 0.18 (95% CI: 0.55–0.63).
showed a trendp = 0.0921.8× alpha
Similarly, peak amplitudes extracted 0–80 ms post R-wave from ECG and uncorrected frontal-central electrodes did not differ significantly between experimental conditions, although ECG amplitudes showed a trend towards a main effect of valence F(1,23) = 3.17, p = 0.092 ( BF 10 = 2.2 provides anecdotal evidence for H A ) (all other p s > 0.27; BF 10 < 0.14 offering substantial evidence for H 0 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0921.8× alphagold
We find the behavior of group A to be different from the rest of the sample only regarding UG offers, and at marginally significant levels ( p = 0.092), as they offer €0.66 more (3.3% of the pie).
Experimental subjects are not different.
Sci Rep · 2013 · PMC3572448
marginally significantp = 0.0931.9× alphagold
Next, we conducted a two-way repeated measures ANOVA on the I A values, with the condition (three movement-focused conditions) and tapping finger as independent variables, revealing a significant main effect of condition (F 2,30 = 8.10, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.351) and a marginally significant main effect of tapping finger (F 3,45 = 2.27, p = 0.093, η p 2 = 0.131); they also showed a significant interaction (F 6,90 = 11.29, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.429).