As for other markers, the variance of beta diversity of the 16S rRNA gene was explained by location (R2=0.218, p = 0.001) while sex was nearly significant (R2=0.012, p = 0.076) (Fig. 3 d).
Excerpts
There was a marginally significant main effect of age ( F (2, 158) = 2.619, p = 0.076, ηp 2 = 0.032; Fig. 2A ).
When running the analysis with Background TV as a covariate all main and interaction effects reported above remained significant, apart from the main effect of half on the proportion of corrective looks, which became marginally significant ( p = 0.076).
Additionally, the positive association between ALPL expression and fasting insulin reached borderline significance (p = 0.076, Fig. 2 ).
borderline significanceP = 0.076
The difference showed borderline significance (P = 0.076).
Significant differences were observed among the five groups in terms of their evaluations of the morality of doctors, p = .003, and marginally significant differences were observed in terms of competence evaluations, p = .076.
showed a trendp = 0.076
Although the E4/DRSP group showed a trend toward a shorter duration from pill initiation to ovulation than the EE/GS group (4.71 ± 1.60 days vs. 6.86 ± 2.27 days), the difference was not significant ( p = 0.076).
There was also a statistical trend for an association between SED and CVD risk (β = 0.012, SE = 0.007, p = 0.076).
The same analysis comparing nested PCR and qRT-PCR-HRM-G1/G2 primer pair also showed a gain of sensitivity at the onset (17% to 30%, respectively), although differences in this case are not quite significant (Fisher Exact test p = 0.0763).
Exposure to the viral inoculum was a significant predictor of this pathology (X 2 = 12.37, p < 0.0004), and chronic exposure to OSS resulted in a positive trend toward higher numbers of individuals exhibiting this symptom (X 2 = 3.13, p < 0.0769).
marginally non-significantp = 0.077
The increase was especially pronounced at night, with a 4.5 fold increase (Table S1 ) although this interaction was marginally non-significant in the linear model (‘Day vs Night’ x ‘Before and After cyclone Yasi’: df = 1, 24, z = 1.765, p = 0.077).
The difference induced by the fertiliser treatment was marginally significant ( p = 0.077).
showed a trendp = 0.077
Only the variable “being married” showed a trend to be significant (Z = −1.767, p = 0.077) ( Tables 4 and 5 ).
showed a trendp = 0.077
During the fifth wave (T3) peace of mind showed a trend to significant decrease compared to before the pandemic (T0) and during the first wave (T1) ( p = 0.077 and p = 0.068 respectively).
showed a trendp = 0.077
The laser guide group showed a trend of small error than that in the conventional group (p = 0.077).
This analysis shows a marginally significant effect of the interaction “naivety x depletion” (without control: coeff = −0.109, p = 0.077; with control: coeff = −0.111, p = 0.071), suggesting that the effect of ego-depletion on cooperation among naïve subjects was different from its effect on experienced subjects.
The main effect of CONDITION revealed a slight trend towards more high-probability triplets being generated in the Inclusion than in the Exclusion condition ( F (1, 79) = 3.205, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.039).
However, only a statistical trend was observed (Mann–Whitney test, p = 0.077).
showed a trendP = 0.077
Age was predicted by the mean amplitude of fast spindles (GLMM, F 1,8 = 27.608, P = 0.001), which decreased with years of age; was predicted by a decrease in their density (GLMM, F 1,8 = 6.454, P = 0.035), while frequency showed a trend to increase with age (GLMM, F 1,8 = 4.132, P = 0.077).
The main effect of Emotion was marginally significant ( F 1,39 = 3.289, p = 0.077, η p 2 = 0.078, BF incl = 0.399 suggesting anecdotal evidence), with a higher sensitivity for happiness than fear.
showed a trendp = 0.077
Statistical analysis by simple contrast test was performed and showed a trend toward a difference between the groups ([f (3,39) = 0.49 p = 0.077].
a trend toward significancep = 0.077
Also, a trend toward significance (p = 0.077) is also reported in the clinical and neurophysiological domains (Empirical contribution coefficient is 0.463).
40) in the kelp forests than in the urchin barrens respectively, when using density data, though the differences in overall species numbers were only marginally significant (paired t test: t = 2.644, df = 3, P = 0.077).
Mid3rd exhibited a significant decrease with age before COVID-19 infection ( p = 0.021), and npxG showed a marginally significant decrease with age before COVID-19 infection ( p = 0.077).
The logistic models indicated that survival of bream was lower at higher rotations with marginal significance ( p = 0.077) (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table S1 ).