opuntia approaching significance (p = 0.07).
Excerpts
Moreover, we observed a barely significant interaction between TM6SF2 polymorphism and BMI (OR = 0.8, 95% CI, 0.63-1.01, P = 0.07).
The analysis revealed a marginally significant main effect of Target, F (1, 17) = 3.66, p = 0.07, η p 2 = 0.18; however, we found no significant main effect of Cue, F (1, 17) = 0.75, p = 0.399, η p 2 = 0.04.
Encoding of novel faces vs same faces Only one channel showed marginally significant difference in HbO between the encoding of novel and same faces where HbO increase was higher for the novel faces (ch 1; paired t-test, FDR corrected p-value = 0.07) (Fig. 1 ).
Although des-acyl ghrelin secretion was unchanged upon C75 treatment, acyl-ghrelin secretion showed a decreasing trend upon FAS inhibition compared to control ( P = 0.07 by Kruskal-Wallis test) (Fig.
Regional population dynamics A marginally significant negative value of Tajima’s D (–1.27, P = 0.070, Table 1 ) and MDA results ( Supplementary Fig.
There was also a marginally significant interaction between Group and Sex, F (4, 699) = 2.11, p = 0.07.
2 , the Useless risk group (Cluster 2) showed significantly lower loss aversion in MGT, and higher scores in stimulant risk assessed with S&IRQ, than Risk-avoidant (Cluster 1) and Useful risk (Cluster 3) groups; additionally, the Useless risk group also scored significantly lower than the Useful risk group on the IGT and showed a significant trend ( p = 0.070) towards less consistency in their decisions as assessed by the MGT than the latter group (Table 4 ).
The interaction between SOD and translucency was marginally significant ( F (1, 72) = 3.44, MSE = 0.44, p = 0.07, η 2 = 0.05).
Follow-up analyses revealed that while there were no significant interactions between group and trial quadrant for phases IS and NL (all ps ≥ 0.160), there was a marginally significant interaction for the FT data, F (1,62) = 3.399, p = 0.070, partial η 2 = 0.052.
2c ), as well as borderline significant different levels for IL-10 WCS (p = 0.07) and IP-10 WCS (p = 0.06).
However, the negative correlation of C24:0-Cer with fecal calprotectin in patients with UC was almost significant ( P = 0.07) 39 .
We found some evidence of longer mOS in patients with HER2-positivity gain in the metastatic setting, although at a not fully statistically significant extent ( p = 0.07).
Age also differed slightly between musicians and non-musicians, albeit marginally significant ( p = 0.07).
borderline significanceP = 0.07
Six DEGs (PARP1, DUSP23, PCDH17, PSEN2, H3f3aos, EPHX1 ) located to the QTLs Perio 3 and Perio4 ( Table 1 , H3f3oas and Dusp 23 have no human orthologous and showed only borderline significance with P = 0.07). 15 DEGs had been reported in previous human GWAS on periodontitis with P < 9 × 10 −6 ( C1orf 87, HLA-DOA, BIRC 5 , CCDC 13 , GLDC, GPR 141 , OTOF, IFI 16 , ETNK 2 , TTLL 11 , ATP 5 S, GRID 1 , LBP, NIN , and VAV 1; Appendix Table 4 ) .
4 a: χ 2 = 11.07, p = 0.011) but only marginally significant in presence of flashlight (Fig. 4 b: χ 2 = 7.0545, p = 0.070).
nearly statistically significantp = 0.07
We observed the same trend as that observed in the previous study 10 , and this difference was nearly statistically significant ( p = 0.07).
Cigarette-related stimuli evoked LPPs were not significantly different from those evoked by low arousing stimuli (i.e., romantic, food, and violence), even though the difference between cigarette-related and food stimuli was trending towards significance, with cigarette-related evoking greater LPPs ( p = 0.07).
marginally non-significantp = 0.07
The effect of scale fragmentation on growth rate was negative, but marginally non-significant (p = 0.07; Table 2 ).
Indeed, the model accounting for nine variables (the gain of similarity of three muscles per three phases) was almost significant (R = 0.65, p = 0.07), with the individual contributions confirming a prominent role of similarity gain for ADM in reaching (β = − 0.41 p = 0.02) and holding (β = − 0.40 p = 0.06) phases, and only marginal, non-significant, contributions of other variables.
Moreover, this technique showed a nearly significant (P = 0.07) correlation between the level of expertise, quantified here as the total training volume, and the gains observed with M1 tDCS (Fig. 2 C).
showed a trendp = 0.07
These post-hoc comparisons also showed a trend that Remember trials were associated with increased frequency of subsequent information-seeking relative to Unfamiliar trials, p = 0.07.
showed a trendp = 0.070
In the FST (F2.45 = 3.242, p = 0.048, n = 16), CUS rats showed a trend toward more time spent immobile over the 6-min test period than rats of the non-CUS control group (p = 0.070).
The effect of Task was significant for dynamic faces (t(16) = 2.28, p = 0.03) and marginally significant effect for static faces (t(16) = 1.89, p = 0.07).
By contrast, no association between LHDL-P and mortality was observed, except for an almost significant positive trend (p = 0.07) between LHDL-P and death rates.