Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Moreover, the simple main effects of flow direction on the 4–6- and 7–9-month-old infants and on the adults were significant ( F (1,114) = 26.52, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.19; F (1,114) = 19.71, p < 0.001 , η p 2 = 0.15; and F (1,114) = 10.75, p = 0.002 , η p 2 = 0.09; respectively); it was marginally significant on the 10–12-month-olds ( F (1,114) = 3.89, p = 0.051 , η p 2 = 0.13).
nearly significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Analysis of Lot-R (assessing optimism and pessimism) revealed a nearly significant difference between the two sub-groups (t (39) = −2.012, p = 0.051) with lower scores in participants with positive Δ TENS effectiveness (12.61 ± 0.83) compared to those with negative Δ TENS effectiveness (15.22 ± 1.02), suggesting that the former were more pessimist than the latter ( Fig. 4f ).
marginally significantp = .0511.0× alphagold
The two conditions with potential ostensive cues (Nodding and Nodding with direct gaze) resulted in marginally significant gaze following and medium effect sizes ( t (21) = 1.715, p = .051, d = 0.75, t (21) = 1.699, p = .052, d = 0.74, respectively).
Is ostension any more than attention?
Sci Rep · 2014 · PMC4058873
marginally significantp = 0.0511.0× alphagold
Age stratification revealed younger-old (65–75) achieved 24% improvement (d = 1.38), middle-old (76–85) achieved 19% improvement (d = 1.12), and oldest-old (86+) achieved 14% improvement (d = 0.89), with age-by-time interaction marginally significant (F(2,297) = 3.02, p = 0.051) suggesting slightly attenuated but still substantial effects in oldest users.
a statistical trendp = 0.05181.0× alphagold
Analysis of the pattern of errors showed that there were similar amounts of premature fixation break errors prior to any stimulus change event with 0.075 mg/kg/24 h compared to control days, while higher doses were loosely linked with a statistical trend to higher proportions of premature fixation break errors (Wilcoxon rank sum test, p = 0.0518) ( Fig. 2E ).