Excerpts

This impairment was notably mitigated following HFs treatment, with a highly significant reduction in escape latency observed( P < 0.05).

During the grower feeding phase (Table 4 ), all parameters were highly significant ( p < 0.05), except for mean daily dry matter intake and the feed conversion ratio.

For SBP, the ANCOVA test did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.050, Table 3 ).

The family history of obesity showed borderline significance for steatosis (p = 0.05) but was not significant for MAFLD (Table 10 ).

However, a clear trend toward longer survival with low-NEO status was noticed, especially in the PEMBRO subgroup (27.8 vs. 16.2 months, p = 0.05, Fig.

gummosa essential oil until the end of the storage period, and this difference was completely significant at the end of the storage time ( P < 0.05).

Marginal significance was found in anatomical (group 1:80%, group 2:96.6%, group 3:96%, group 4:96.4%, p = 0.05) but not functional success (group 1:85%, group 2:85.7%, group 3:83.3%, group 4:88.9%, p = 0.75) at postoperative 12-month.

Along with the declining prevalence of COPD, a decreasing trend in the prevalence of COPD-related PH was identified from 2009 to 2018 (from 44.8 in 2009 to 33.1 in 2018 per 1000 person-year, p < 0.05).

Linear modelling Among the selected predictors, the number of long term time series, population density, sustainable development index, and the number of tourists were found to be highly significant ( p < 0.05), whereas country growth and Trompenaar’s 7th dimension were borderline significant ( p = 0.05–0.06; Supplement 4).

The survival rate showed a highly significant difference between treatments and control ( P < 0.05).

In the patient group a significant positive correlation was found between Glutamate/Cr and GM-content (p = 0.028, R 2 = 0.52) as well as Glutamate/Cr and tNAA/Cr (p = 0.003, R 2 = 0.74), whereas tNAA/Cr and GM-content was borderline significant (p = 0.05, R 2 = 0.44).

For the full dataset (N = 43), Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs were not significant, and Fu and Li’s D was negative, but only moderately significant (0.10 > p > 0.05), suggesting population expansion.

L-value showed a decreasing trend throughout storage for each applied biofilm (apart from PVC), without statistically significant differences ( p < 0.05).

The antioxidant activities were found highly significant ( p < 0.05) in the tetraploid compared to the diploid.

At the end of the 10-week feeding trial, the serum ALP and AST values showed a decreasing trend in NTs-added groups compared to those in the control group ( p < 0.05).

By comparing assessing methods for fungal growth in control media and media amended with various concentrations of PP-AgNPs, the total area and inhibition zone were highly significant, with p -values of p < 0.05.

Affective state The Friedman test revealed a significant effect of experimental phase on valence (X 2 (1) = 4.80, p < .05) and a marginally significant effect on arousal (X 2 (1) = 3.79, p = .05).

For DFS, the association approached but did not reach statistical significance (SHR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00–1.49, p = 0.05) (Table 3 ).

During optogenetic stimulation of the VC, the MGB response exhibited an increasing trend (p < 0.05 for paired Student’s t test but does not pass Holm-Bonferroni correction; Supplementary Figure S7 ), suggesting a possibility that VC co-modulates auditory processing at multiple stages immediately prior to the cortex.

Although limited by sample size, the P value for LMNA did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05), whereas CEBPB exhibited a significant response (Fig. 8 K, L).

Differences were considered significant and highly significant when indicated as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, # p < 0.05, and ## p < 0.01.

This equates to an odds ratio of 1.2 – 1.4; in other words, the odds of participation is 1.2–1.4 times higher given a 1-unit increase ‘intrinsic (pro-nature) motivation.’ Native Hawaiian ethnicity was also highly significant and positive in two of the models ( β = 1.6 ± 0.6, p < 0.05 at 0.25% payment threshold and β = 2.0 ± 0.7, p < 0.01 at 0.5% threshold), equating to an odds ratio of 5.0 and 7.4, respectively.

1 a) and a marginally significant effect on average spot size ( t = 1.97, p = 0.05) (Fig. 1 b).

Of these, 12 were nominally significant at P < 0.05 and none were nominally significant at P < 0.01 (Table 3 ).

Focusing on the test phase, we first ran a repeated measures ANOVA on test performance as a function of trial (old, new) and condition (conceptual, neutral), which revealed a main effect of trial ( F (1, 23) = 28.38, p < 0.001, partial η 2 = 0.55), a marginally significant main effect of condition ( F (1,23) = 4.37, p = 0.05, partial η 2 = 0.16), and a significant trial x condition interaction ( F (1,23) = 6.95, p = 0.01, partial η 2 = 0.23).