Excerpts

Annual WUE exhibited a decreasing trend for shrublands (p < 0.05), an increasing trend for deciduous broadleaf forests (p < 0.05), and no significant trends for other vegetation types ( Fig.

Compared with subpopulations C1 and C3, the traits in C2 exhibited highly significant (P < 0.05) positive or negative association in both soil (Fig. 3 ) and hydroponics (Fig. 4 ) experiments.

In rats that received 2-week sub-concussion, the mean plasma concentration of pro-inflammatory chemokine, CXCL1 showed approximately 100% reduction compared to the Sham group rats, although it did not reach statistical significance at p < 0.05 (Fig. 4 ).

2 a); similarly, among BRCA wild-type patients, those with lower NLR had a slightly significant 3-month increase in mPFS, compared with patients in group 2 (19 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.05, Fig. 2 b).

ANOVA analysis was performed to statistically verify the model, which illustrates a statistically highly significant model ( p < 0.05) and reasonable values of R 2 (95.09% for determination and 90.89% for adjusted).

Seasonal variation and bottom salinity ( P < 0.001) exerted highly significant effects on abundance, with latitude and surface chlorophyll a ( P < 0.05) content, P. trituberculatus abundance initially increased slowly, before accelerating as the chlorophyll a concentrations increased.

4 a) showed an overall decrease for the historical period and both scenarios, being marginally statistically significant (p < 0.05) in the RCP8.5 scenario.

Duration of hospital stay also did not defer significantly between groups, but a higher proportion of patients in the CLD group (41.2% vs 23.8%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with a difference that approached significance ( p = 0.05).

In the M2 macrophage-positive control co-culture group, the IL-1β level in the cell supernatant showed a decreasing trend ( P > 0.05), while the IL-10 level increased significantly ( P < 0.01).

We annotate statistically significant (P < 0.002) associations in Tables and note nominally significant (0.002 < P < 0.05) associations below.

Harboring the L144S was associated with a significantly longer time to bulbar involvement than K3E (p = 0.0015, log-rank test) and with borderline significance longer time than G41S (p = 0.050), without significant difference between K3E and G41S (p = 0.44).

The mast cells were found to manifest borderline significance (P = 0.050).

The following criteria were set to determine positive results: (1) consistent direction of estimates across the three methods (all estimates are either greater than 0 or less than 0) 32 ; (2) correction of results using the Bonferroni correction procedure to mitigate potential false-positive results due to multiple testing 28 ; A nominally significant threshold (0.05/N < P < 0.05, where N is the number of multiple tests) was considered suggestive evidence, while P < 0.05/N was considered significant association.

However, as for female orchard workers, all 8 HRV parameters showed significant changes (P < 0.05), only meanHR showed an increasing trend, and the remaining time-domain parameters RR SDNN RMSSD, SDSD, PNN50, PNN20, CV showed significant decreases (P < 0.05).

SNPs that were identified as being shared loci (GWAS-significant loci for BMI or WHRadjBMI and nominally significant (p < 0.05) for basal or stimulated lipolysis) were used as the exposure.

Whereas the simple main effect of the block was marginally significant in the phone-present condition, F (1.48, 41.42) = 3.53, p = 0.05, η 2 = 0.0498, there were no significant differences between the blocks.

Figure 2 shows that this reduction in spindles was present for 10/11 investigated regions (all p-values < 0.05) and was borderline significant for the midline (p = 0.05).

There is a highly significant relationship in the linear regression between the natural logarithms of mean HCW values and instars (n = 3, R 2 = 0.994, F = 170.82, p = 0.05) (Fig. 8 b).

Differences between group data (especially between CA and control) were considered statistically significant and highly significant when P < 0.05 and P < 0.001, respectively.

However, the Asian population exhibited a borderline significant association with this polymorphism (OR = 0.725, 95% CI = 0.525–1.000, p = 0.050) (Fig. 3 ).

The statistical significance level was established at p < 0.05, however, we also reported a marginally significant effect at 0.06 > p > 0.05.

There was an increasing trend in PPE age with increasing years of service (tau-b = 0.13, p < 0.05), fire attendance frequency (tau-b = 0.10, p < 0.05), and seniority of role (tau-b = 0.05, p < 0.05).

SPM regression analysis revealed that the peak knee adduction moment of the lead leg was not associated with pelvis position during the downswing; however, it almost reached significance at p = 0.05 at transition of pelvis (TP).

Furthermore, upon accounting for these confounders, there was a borderline significant difference for TyG across the tertiles of hPDI (P-value = 0.05) and a significant difference for TG (P-value = 0.04) in the adjusted model.

Statistical T Tests were conducted and the results show that there is a borderline significant difference between the average Weighted F1-scores of EEGNet and LSTM-EEGNet, which has t(5)=2.029; p-value=0.050 with .