2 a); similarly, among BRCA wild-type patients, those with lower NLR had a slightly significant 3-month increase in mPFS, compared with patients in group 2 (19 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.05, Fig. 2 b).
Excerpts
greater resorption of the EMD was seen in the mock transfected group when compared to the miR-153 transfected group), the difference did not reach statistical significance ( P < 0.05).
Plant Zn 2+ concentration and translocation in wheat Analysis of Variance for Zn concentration showed that response of wheat to Zn application was highly significant (p ≤ 0.05) and a substantial difference existed among Zn uptake through different sources of applied Zn.
Marginally significant seasonal effect on fungal compositional pattern was also detected (R 2 = 0.06; p = 0.05), where the 95% confidence interval ellipses for autumn and winter were isolated, denoting distinct composition (Table 2 ; Fig. 3 a).
showed a trendp = 0.05
Moreover, the EES showed a trend toward reduced incidence rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and TVR (p = 0.05).
Annual WUE exhibited a decreasing trend for shrublands (p < 0.05), an increasing trend for deciduous broadleaf forests (p < 0.05), and no significant trends for other vegetation types ( Fig.
Utilizing PHR as a quartile variable, increments in FT3 and TT4 levels, along with the prevalence of hypothyroidism, were observed in quartiles Q2, Q3, and Q4 compared to Q1, with a significant trend across quartiles ( P < 0.05).
More than 600 highly significant motifs (p-value < 0.05) were identified in each cell line.
4 , the ACE inhibitor users within the dry climate subgroup showed a considerably higher risk of psoriasis incidence compared to the non-users (OR 3.45, 95% CI 2.05–5.79), whereas the analysis of the temperate climate subgroup showed marginal significance ( p = 0.05).
Pairwise comparisons of species communities identified marginally significant differences only between MGA and UGA (p = 0.05) and DrP and MtP (p = 0.05).
The probability of chance (P-value) was used to assess the significance of the data; a value of P < 0.001 was interpreted as highly significant, a value of P < 0.05 was interpreted as significant, and a value of P > 0.05 was interpreted as non-significant.
1 ), fasting state insulin clearance did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.05).
Analysis of variance indicated that cultivars, PGPR and drought stress all had a highly significant (P < 0.05) effect on crop growth, tuber yield and drought indexes.
borderline significancep = 0.05
denticola at 6 months had in both antimicrobial-groups significantly less deep sites than placebo, while at those positive at 12 months showed a borderline significance ( p = 0.05) for the 3-day antimicrobial-group (Table 2 ).
Pearson correlation analysis revealed that out of the 12 soil factors examined, 6 of them showed highly significant correlations with EMF (Fig. 5 , P < 0.05).
Seasonal variation and bottom salinity ( P < 0.001) exerted highly significant effects on abundance, with latitude and surface chlorophyll a ( P < 0.05) content, P. trituberculatus abundance initially increased slowly, before accelerating as the chlorophyll a concentrations increased.
A similar trend was found in layer 5/6 for which, however, differences did not reach statistical significance (SED: 3.064 ± 1.14; RUN: 0.137 ± 0.12; naïve: 0.367 ± 0.24) (One-way ANOVA on ranks, Dunns’ Method, p < 0.05 for difference among the three groups; p = 0.09 SED vs. naïve; p > 0.1 RUN vs. naïve).
The mean age of the cases caused by liver abscess was 56.85 ± 15.45, which showed no statistical difference (p = 0.63) comparing with the others; however, the mean age of the UTI cases was older, and was marginally significant when comparing with the others (67.30 ± 13.89, p = 0.05, Mann–whitney U test).
On the other hand, we found out that the mean age of cases caused by UTI, the second most common cause, was older than the others and showed a marginal significance in our sample population (p = 0.05).
Kaplan and Meier's method used to estimate overall and Progression-free survival and log-rank test compared survival curves All statistical comparisons were two-tailed with a significance level of p-value ≤ 0.05 indicates significant, p < 0.001 indicates a highly significant difference while p > 0.05 indicates a non-significant difference.
Higher amounts of total lipids (LIP/TBM, p < 0.05) and lower amounts of total proteins (PRT/TBM, p < 0.05) were detected only in Hi75 and Hi100 liver samples; an increasing trend in fatty acids amount (FA/TBM, p < 0.05) was detected in all livers samples of fish fed diets with increasing BSF meal inclusion levels, together with a decrease of both carbohydrates (COH/TBM, p < 0.05) and phosphates (PH/TBM, p < 0.05); lower levels of glycogen (GLY/TBM, p < 0.05) were found in Hi50 and Hi75 groups.
23 , values are considered statistical robust when at least 50% of the climate models show a significant trend (p < 0.05) and at least 80% of those have the same trend sign.
In the diabetic control group, the blood glucose levels had been also rising since the injection of the STZ by the end of the sixth week; but in the diabetic trained group, a decreasing trend was observed which revealed a significant reduction started at the beginning of the fourth week of the study (p < 0.05).
P values were calculated, and statistical significance was expressed as highly significant with *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
3 a), although this result was only marginally significant, and with higher PHA response (Estimate ± SE = 0.07 ± 0.03, t 104 = 1.94, p = 0.05; Fig. 3 b) (Table 2 ).