Barely Significant

Excerpts

27,100 sentences · 1 filter applied

barely significantP = 0.04290.9× alphagold
However, the increase in the frequency of asymmetric cell division defects in neb MI0225 / +; jumu Df(3R)Exel6157 / +double heterozygotes over the additive sum of those in the component neb MI0225 / +and jumu Df(3R)Exel6157 / +single heterozygotes is barely significant ( P = 0.0429) (Figs. 5 a–c, 6 a, Supplementary Table S1 ).
marginally significantp = 0.0430.9× alphagold
Pairwise comparisons performed with Mann-Whitney U-test between the species showed that there was a marginally significant difference in the mean grain size between the Barn and the Red-rumped Swallows (U = 8, p = 0.043) but a non-significant trend between the Barn Swallows and the House Martins (U = 12, p = 0.058).
marginally significantp = 0.0430.9× alphagold
The mixed ANOVA comparing High and Low CA-BAT Performance groups’ Urge to Move ratings to the High Complexity and Random drumbeats yielded a marginally significant interaction between the two factors (F(1,28) = 4.492, p = 0.043, η 2 G = 0.022) driven by a small effect in the High Beat Perception Performance group (F(1,14) = 5.189, p = 0.039, η 2 G = 0.077) showing higher ratings for the High Complexity relative to the Random drumbeat that was absent in the Low Beat Perception Performance group (F(1,14) = 0.115, p = 0.740, η 2 G < 0.001).
Pupil drift rate indexes groove ratings.
Sci Rep · 2022 · PMC9270355
nominally significantP = 0.0430.9× alphagold
cruzi infection susceptibility The allelic and genotypic frequencies of seronegative and seropositive individuals from the Colombian cohort were compared in Tables S3–1 The minor allele frequency (MAF), in rs8193036*C was higher in seronegative than in seropositive individuals, being nominally significant after the adjustment by sex and age [P = 0.043, odds ratio (OR) = 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.70–0.99].
borderline significancep = 0.0430.9× alpha
5 ) stratified by the three groups, T2DM was no significant predictor for MACE in Group I and Group II univariately (Group I: HR = 1.39 [0.59–3.25], p = 0.451; Group II: HR = 1.34 [0.84–2.13], p = 0.214), and there was a borderline significance in patients Group III (HR = 1.46 [1.01–2.11], p = 0.043, respectively).
a significant trendp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
Intriguingly, σ cyto was observed to fall from the baseline value in all cases following exposure to COVID-19 or the vaccine; both the Vaccinated and Recovered populations showed a significant trend starting at baseline and slowly moving to a terminal value of around 0.3 S/m after approximately 6 weeks (Vaccinated, * p = 0.044) to 10 weeks (Recovered, *p = 0.036).
a marginal trendp = 0.0440.9× alphagold
In this case, the mean grain size presented a marginal trend towards a significant difference among the three species (Kruskal-Wallis H = 6.23, p = 0.044), whereas the observed differences in the sorting of the grains and the Qz content were not statistically significant (Kruskal-Wallis H = 3.84, p = 0.146 and H = 4.97, p = 0.083, respectively).