borderline significanceP = 0.04
The differences between the training and testing sets were not statistically significant for almost all the demographic and clinical variables, except for tumor grade with a borderline significance ( P = 0.04).
The differences between the training and testing sets were not statistically significant for almost all the demographic and clinical variables, except for tumor grade with a borderline significance ( P = 0.04).
The meta-analysis showed a trend towards a reduction in the liver proton density fat fraction at the end of treatment (MD: − 2.61%, 95% CI [− 5.05, − 0.17], p = 0.04, I 2 = 78%, low certainty of evidence).
Greater convergence was observed in the VIS and SMN within the theta and alpha bands, and for VIS also within the gamma band, although in SMN, the difference was only marginally significant ( p = 0.04).
Sprats mostly fed on small copepods ( Microcalanus sp., Calanus sp., and Acartia clausi ) and cladocerans (Table S2 a), and changes in the diet according to size were just below the level of significance ( pseudo-F 1,56 = 2.29, p = 0.04).
Similarly, a decreasing trend was observed in the incidence of PPD across tertiles of FLOBS (24.0%, 20.5%, 10.0%; P = 0.04).
Interestingly, rs4506565 (but not rs7901695) shows a nominally significant effect on transcript relative expression of TCF7L2 (p = 0.04) from sQTLseekeR first-phase GTEx data, although clearly this requires additional functional validation.
The MD values of the cerebellum showed a trend of higher in the patient group than in the control group (1.267 ± 0.212 vs. 1.121 ± 0.196, P = 0.040).
For both stability indices, the permuted ANOVAs revealed significances for polymer types ( p = 0.001, Table S2), whereas only τ max showed slight significance for the soil extracts including dH 2 O ( p = 0.04). τ YP showed high effect sizes of the polymer type and the soil extract with ɳp 2 = 0.51 (Table S2) and ɳp 2 = 0.20 while the interaction of both showed medium effect size of ɳp 2 = 0.12.
In the univariate analysis, a highly significant association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) history (OR 4.846, p = 0.04), CVP at admission (OR: 1.185, p = 0–014), SvO 2 at admission (OR 0.942, p < 0.001) and GFR at admission GFR at admission (OR 0.951, p = 0.002) with the development of AKI could be demonstrated.
gingivalis IgG categorical level in every higher hierarchical models were similar with the age-adjusted OR and 95% CI, which showed a significant trend ( P = 0.04) of increased risk by increasing serum P. gingivalis IgG level.
The analyses revealed a marginally significant difference only for unstructured stimuli (unstructured: F (1,36) = 4.2, p = 0.04, LBF = 0.06; grouped: F (1,36) = 1.26, p = 0.27, η 2 = 0.03, LBF = − 0.4).
Furthermore, Stroop2 task resulted in a marginally significant negative correlation (R = −0.54, p = 0.04) between the individual task reaction times and the ROI-averaged HbO 2 responses from the PTSD group (See Fig. 8 ) while no significant correlation was seen in the control group.
The borderline significance of this primary outcome (p = 0.04 for vaccine efficacy differing from zero) posed the question of whether the result could have been a false positive.
The T allele showed a protective effect in the homozygous model with marginal significance (P = 0.04, OR = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.62-0.98; Fig. 3 ).
The difference between 10% and 20% DMSO was noted as marginally statistically significant ( p = 0.04).
The Pearson correlation analysis showed marginally significant ( p = 0.041–0.076) moderate correlations between the working time values determined using ISO 4049 and FTIR (Fig. 4 ).
The nominally significant difference in interaction time when confronted to XX* and X*Y females (V = 56, p = 0.041) did not survive correction for multiple testing.
An apparent trend suggested that the severity of AKI was correlated with advancing age ( P = 0.041).
The positive correlation between the H-score of EZH and ECI2 reached marginal significance (F = 4.30, p = 0.041).
FKRGL showed borderline significance ( p = 0.041), but this did not remain significant after Bonferroni correction.
Similarly, neither pCREB1a nor pCREB1c levels varied significantly between time periods in both the non-hibernation and hibernation seasons [one-way ANOVA, p = 0.831 (pCREB1a, non-hibernation), p = 0.0413 (pCREB1a, hibernation), p = 0.282 (pCREB1c, non-hibernation), p = 0.213 (pCREB1c, hibernation)], of which, although the one-way ANOVA analysis showed a marginally significant difference for pCREB1a in the hibernation season ( p = 0.0413), the subsequent Tukey’s test showed no significant difference in pairwise comparisons (Fig. 4 e, f).
Although the rates of male proportion, smoking, combined CAD, and chronic kidney disease were lower in the low-positive and high-positive groups compared with the negative group, the positive groups had a higher frequency of degenerative changes of the AV with an increasing trend (p = 0.042).
Diversity in DBF was higher than in CBF with marginal significance (p = 0.042).
The smallest magnitude of difference was observed between TLSD and TTCD2, with TLSD being only 0.5 dB lower ( p = 0.042, marginally significant).
8 ), cluster 3 showed a nominally significant enrichment for genes located in CeD loci ( p value = 0.042; Fig. 5 C), with around 18% of cluster 3 genes being located near a CeD locus.