Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = .6513.0× alphagold
By contrast, nonmusicians showed a linear N400 learning curve: the N400 mean amplitude increased through exposure reaching a marginally significant increase during the 4th time bin (first time bin: −0.16 μV; 2 nd time bin: −0.04 μV, p = .65; 3 rd time bin: −0.21 μV, p = .85 and 4 th time bin: −0.68 μV, p = .06).
marginally non-significantP = 0.73014.6× alpha
KM analysis for IV CSCLC, IV SCLC and IV NSCLC after PSM After PSM, the mOS and mCSS for patients with IV CSCLC were both 6.00 months, while those for SCLC patients were 5.00 months, there were marginally non-significant differences in OS (P = 0.730; Fig 5A ) and CSS (P = 0.685; Fig 5B ) between IV CSCLC and IV SCLC groups.
showed a trendp = 0.77215.4× alpha
Just like in the EPM also the NSF confirmed enhanced anxiety in 5-HT 1A (-/-) knockout mice, time spent in the center of the arena (Wt = 27.32±3.81s, 1A-ko = 17.57±2.6s, p = 0.042) is significantly decreased and time till feeding showed a trend towards longer waiting times (Wt 118.56±19.16s, 1A-ko 146.69±36.67s, p = 0.772) ( S1F and S1G Fig ).
highly significantp = 0.878817.6× alphaqualifiedgold
While there was no main effects of Chamber or Genotype on entries performed in the sociability test, there was a highly significant variability amongst subjects (Time, Two-way ANOVA; Genotype: F(1, 20)=0.02387, p = 0.8788; Chamber: F(1, 20)=3.800, p = 0.0654; Chamber x Genotype: F(1, 20)=8.140, p = 0.0098**; Subject: F(20, 20)=4.364, p = 0.0009***) (B).
a weak trendp = 0.88917.8× alphagold
This was non-significant for all four response variables, although there was a weak trend towards gaze alternating more at the helpful experimenter (looking: Estimate ± SE = -0.028 ± 0.201, z = -0.14, p = 0.889; interacting: Estimate ± SE = -0.065 ± 0.194, z = -0.336, p = 0.737; proximity: Estimate ± SE = -0.123 ± 0.158, z = -0.779, p = 0.436; gaze alternation: Estimate ± SE = 0.361 ± 0.201, z = 1.802, p = 0.071).
marginally non-significantP = 0.89417.9× alpha
Mean scores of sheltered-site (n = 16) and exposed-site snails (n = 51) differed on RW1 but not on RW2 or RW3, although difference on the latter was marginally non-significant (MANOVA: Box's M, P = 0.894; Wilk's lambda,P<0.001; Levene's test: RW1, P = 0.400; RW2, P = 0.032; RW3, P = 0.250.