Interestingly, the results now show that in June, one of the structures associated to Scenario B (B-DAG4) was highly significant (χ 2 = 13, p = 0.26, df = 8) based on changes in DOC alone ( Figure 5C ), and all variables were well described by the model (from 81 to 98% of variations explained).
Excerpts
A subgroup analysis between first and second round associations did not show nominally significant differences ( Q (1) = 1.251; p = .263) between the two for the 2016/2017 season.
By the same test total zinc release from two sets of tablets having similar hardness but differing composition were also not significantly significant with P = 0.2634.
showed a trendp = 0.267
IKKbeta pathway The results obtained by western blot showed a trend towards an increase of pIKKbeta levels in the cortex of WT mice exposed to HFD ( p = 0.267) ( Fig 4D and 4E ).
approached significancep > .27
Neither of these effects approached significance at midline sites ( aspect : F (1, 31) = 1.22, p > .27; aspect × ambiguity : F (1, 31) = 2.04, p > .16).
Additionally, gender was not a meaningfully significant contributor for cancer risk in the MS cohort (OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.98, 1.45, p = 0.27) ( Fig 2D ).
In progressors, PTH levels showed an increasing trend, albeit insignificantly, at T0, compared to pre-transition points T-1 and T-2 ( p = 0.28 and p = 0.3 respectively, Fig 4C and 4D ).
Although the S100B levels in these subjects were reduced after 4 weeks, the difference was not significantly significant (p = 0.28).
DM biomedicine cost didn’t show a significant trend (p = 0.284).
showed a trendp = 0.2888
Although not reaching a level of statistical significance, the detection sensitivity of the MCA system in CTC enumeration showed a trend toward being greater than that of the CellSearch system (p = 0.2888, Wilcoxon test; Table 3 ).
A linear regression model predicting category goodness scores revealed a nonsignificant trend for females of average age (the reference level) to score lower online than in person ( β = -2.38, SE = 2.24, p = 0.29).
Dunn’s test further reveal that participants who could see the arrow reported levels of absorption close to being significant compared to those who did not have it, p = 0.29 for those who could not see the image preview and p = 0.03 for those who had the image available as well, both p values to adjusted to significance level α /2.
We also noticed a possible trend toward a difference in the distribution of TAS2R38 AVI haplotype between smokers and non-smokers (55.3% and 49.9% respectively, P = 0.29), but again this result was not significant in this small sample.
This pattern was not found when comparing a parity task to an NBL task, in which the former did not affect item recognition and the latter was close to being significant (F(1, 32) = 1.11, p = 0.29, η2 = 0.03; F(1, 32) = 4.14, p = 0.05, η2 = 0.11; respectively).
While the association between DDC and fluid reasoning decline was nominally significant, it did not survive correction for multiple testing (Bonferroni p = 0.292).
showed a trendP = 0.299
At the same time we also should note that if sampling collection was restricted to the morning, the relationship between fasting LC and BMI just showed a trend ( P = 0.299).
A decreasing trend of p values at 1 hr (p = 0.30), 1.5 hours (p = 0.05), and 2 hours (p = 0.02) was determined.
In control lines we did not observe a significant trend (10 lines with a decrease, 5 with an increase, 5 remained constant, P = 0.30, two-tailed sign test), with an overall reduction of 20%.
A numerical trend in the same direction in European participants was not significant, t (39) = 1.05, p = .302, d = 0.33 ( Figure 5 ).
The data from the late time-to-hatch colony did not show a significant trend with age (F = 1.20, DF = 1, p = 0.31; r 2 = 0.15).
These two subconditions did not differ significantly from each other, although there was a numerical trend against C+Pro sentences ( β = -0.84; z = -1.47; p = .31).
When the day 28 PCR-corrected cure rates were analysed by country, the heterogeneity test was borderline significant at the 10% level only in the ePP population (ITT: p = 0.324; ePP: p = 0.082), suggesting some minor differences among sites ( Figure 2 ).
showed a trendp = 0.33
When evaluated as single, independent variables in relation to thalamic volume, however, neither duration nor BTX dose showed a trend or significance (R = 0.25, p = 0.33 and R = 0.042, p = 0.87, respectively).
Biosets characterizing GH receptor truncated at amino acid 569 ( GSE11396 , GSE988 ), were either not significant or were marginally significant for feminization (p-value = 0.33 and 3.8E-05, respectively), consistent with the weak to moderate effects of this mutant on GH-dependent phosphorylation of STAT5b [ 54 ].
optimal preparation showed a strong trend for reduced lesion detection (OR 0.94, CI: 0.87–1.01, p = 0.33; data not shown).