Excerpts

While domain-general risk attitudes exhibited a significant relationship with risk premiums, the relationship between Investing domain risk attitudes and risk premium was only marginally significant (β = -0.124, p = .088).

Not undergoing post-OLT CRRT was also a marginally significant predictor of removal from dialysis (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.95 to 2.14, p = 0.088; Table 3 ).

On the other hand, an increased risk, although marginally significant, appeared with the combination of rare alleles at TYR and ADAMTS20 (OR = 1.54; p = 0.088) (See Table 2 ).

Among analyzed SNPs, only VEGFR2 rs12505758 C- variants, compared to T/T, were associated to shorter PFS (HR: 1.36 [1.05–1.75], p = 0.015, dominant genetic model) and OS, with a trend toward significance (HR: 1.34 [0.95–1.88], p = 0.088).

It was found that the IFOV conditions (F = 17.33, p < 0.001) significantly influenced the BTC, while gender had a marginally significant effect on the BTC (F = 3.044, p = 0.088).

In a second sensitivity analysis, adjusting for recent infections or current morbidity showed no substantial changes in results, though in model 3 the effect of attitude towards the pregnancy was attenuated to marginal significance in men (β = -0.38, p = .088), as was the effect of birth weight in women (β = -0.0004, p = .068).

We were surprised to find that after 8 hours of insulin deprivation, plasma ammonia levels (measured by LC-MS/MS) showed a trend (p = 0.088) toward lower levels in insulin-deprived vs. treated T1D, even though these patients exhibited greater urinary nitrogen loss over the first 6 hours of insulin deprivation [13] .

However, retention was higher when learning was followed by the ‘bangs only’ delay than by the ‘sounds only’ delay condition, and this difference was near-significant ( t (35) = −1.755, p = .088).

The direct effect of HTD explanation on purchase intention is marginally significant ( p = .088; B = .221).

It is noteworthy that there was also a nearly significant trend for this effect in left PMd (p = 0.088), implying a bilateral representation of the visual movement consequences in that area as well.

The interaction of group and memory load was marginally significant ( F (2, 80) = 2.51, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.06).

The analysis revealed a significant interaction between emotional condition and awareness level ( F 1, 40 = 27.347, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.406), a significant interaction between emotional condition, T2 lag and awareness level ( F 7, 280 = 3.369, p = 0.002, η p 2 = 0.078), a significant main effect of T2 lag ( F 7, 280 = 25.551, p <0.001, η p 2 = 0.390) and a marginally significant main effect of awareness level ( F 1, 40 = 3.064, p = 0.088, η p 2 = 0.071).

fumigatus positivity in serum samples was highest on Day 3 (16 of 18 positive) and Day 4 (17 of 18 positive) but declined on Day 5 (13 of 18 positive) and Day 7 (12 of 18 positive) with waning of immunosuppression and the difference between Day 4 and Day 7 was nearly statistically significant (p = 0.088).

It should be noted that the correlation between genetic distances based on microsatellite data and sampling age ( Figure S1, C ) was marginally significant (p = 0.088) that could contribute to the effect of isolation by distance in the genotype data.

This did produce a trend towards significance (t = 1.704, p = 0.088).

cultripes showed a trend towards a decrease in δ 15 N when at high density, although it was marginally non-significant ( Low - High : F 1,81 = 2.98; P = 0.088; Fig 2 ).

There was a trend towards significance for the interaction of Crossing Status with Eyes And Arms To Side (β = -0.01 (-0.02, 0.00), p = 0.088).

A significant main effect of age was observed ( F (5, 1466) = 10.262, p < 0.001), whereas the main effect of sex was marginally significant ( F (5, 1466) = 2.917, p = 0.088).

Also at the muddy-sand site, OM content was lower in +AS plots than in -AS plots, although the effect was only marginally significant ( p = 0.088 in winter, p = 0.075 in summer).

This finding was statistically significant prior to adjusting for endogenous estrogens (52%, p = 0.031) and marginally significant after adjustment (39%, p = 0.088).

We apply bivariate probit regression to address this unobserved effect and find that the effect of MAOA remains significant for lottery purchase (allele model, p = 0.010, genotype model, p = 0.011) and marginally significant for insurance purchase (allele model, p = 0.088, genotype model, p = 0.088).

However, only the contribution of Extraversion reached a marginal significance (E: β = −.37, p = .088).

A follow-up regression model predicting unique actions from education and proportion of key function play yielded a marginally significant interaction term ( p = .088), so we remain cautious in our interpretation.

1 -D), but the positive relationship between the difference in antibody level between the first and the last egg and FA was marginally significant ( r 2 = 0.17, β ±SE = 10.39±5.72, F 1,16 = 3.30, P = 0.0881).

In the analysis of time alone, the positive linear increase across time became only marginally significant (β = 0.02, p = 0.0884) after adjusting for a significant positive AR1 autocorrelative term (β = 0.8716, p<0.0001; the Durbin-Watson test of lag 1 autocorrelation was significant before adjusting for the AR1, but not after); the autocorrelation term absorbed much of the variance due to the deviation from a straight-line trend.