Excerpts

Additionally, the interaction of previous accuracy in the flanker task and interval was marginally significant, F (1,28) = 3.17, p = 0.08, showing larger PES in the short interval condition (22 ms) compared to the long interval condition (8 ms).

Maternal education showed a trend level association with gamer type (F (1, 150) = 3.09, p = 0.08).

The age difference between XT and ET only approached significance by Mann-Whitney U = 169, p = 0.08.

The h 2 of 0.20 of bill width tended towards significance ( z = 2.33, P = 0.08) whereas the h 2 of 0.05 in bill depth was far from significant ( z = 0.60, P = 0.58).

Compared with the Control and LP groups, the CP group showed a trend for increased osteoblasts (control group, 15.09 cells/mm 2 ; LP group, 18.55 cells/mm 2 ; CP group, 25.44 cells /mm 2 ; control vs CP, p = 0.08; LP vs CP, p = 0.33) in the cranial, middle, and caudal areas as well as the entire bone.

In the ANOVA, we also found a significant effect of session (F 2, 34 = 4.46; p = .02) and a marginally significant work episode x session interaction (F 4,68 = 2.23; p = .08) on the lapses.

ALC-treated nulls showed a trend toward a preference for the novel object [ p = 0.08].

A two-way ANOVA with 2 levels of movement property (dynamic central + static peripheral, static central + dynamic peripheral) x 2 levels of stimulus orientations (upright central + inverted peripheral, inverted central + upright peripheral) on the proportion of valid trials revealed a marginally significant interaction, F (1,17) = 3.53, p = .08, η p 2 = .17.

The interaction of Hemisphere × Tense only approached significance [F(1,22) = 3.1; p = 0.08].

Finally, there was a marginally significant relationship between response to predator simulation and escape latency (χ2 = 3.12; P = 0.08), where lizards that responded rapidly to the predator simulation were also faster to escape.

However, there was a nonsignificant trend linking fear of crime with muscularity estimates r (45) = .27, p <.08.

While these indirect effects were significant at the individual level, they were only marginally significant at the team level ( p = .08).

Ensifera ensifera bill length and guild of plant richness showed a positive trend (GLM: estimate = 0.01, t = 1.78, P = 0.08, Fig 4A ).

= 0.04, t (17) = 3.66, p<.001) and marginally significant increases in life satisfaction (γ 00 = 0.09, S.E. = 0.05, t (17) = 1.73, p = .08) and happiness (γ 00 = 0.11, S.E. = 0.08, t (17) = 1.50, p = .13).

This resulted in a marginally significant interaction between Group and Target Eccentricity (F(1,18) = 3.3, p<0.08; see Fig. 1c ).

SYBR-green quantitative PCR revealed that over-expression of Pgc-1α resulted in a significant down-regulation of Pitx3 to 0.25±0.11 from a 0.79±0.08 level of expression after mCherry ( Figure 5C , 95% CI 0.23 to 0.85; p = 0.003), a nonsignificant trend toward lower Nurr1 expression (0.47±0.14 from 0.93±0.18, a difference of 0.46±0.24; 95% CI −0.08 to 1.0; p = 0.08), and no loss of Lmx1b expression relative to mCherry microinjected SN (1.26±0.33 from 1.1±0.23, a difference of −0.17±0.39; 95% CI −1.07 to 0.73; p = 0.677).

Room was a marginally significant predictor of indoor fungal community composition (ADONIS, df = 3, F. model = 1.26, R 2 = 0.06, p = 0.08.

The deleterious effects of negative emotions were not different between eight-year-olds and 12-year-olds ( β = -294.84; SE = 326.7; z = -.9; p =.37) and were marginally significant between 12-year-olds and 14-year-olds (β = 539.5; SE = 304.5; z = 1.77; p =.08).

Although more samples are needed if more statistically significant conclusions are to be drawn, since in our series, the well-known prognostic marker ALK expression is almost significantly associated with outcome (p = 0.08).

Amount of L1 use had a marginally significant main effect F (1, 39) = 3.26, p = .08, R 2 = .08.

After controlling for Trait Anxiety, the correlation between ΔANI and Bell 1 was marginally significant for the entire group ( r = .32, p = .08), and significant for the group that failed to solve the puzzle ( r = .59, p < .05).

The ANOVA showed a trend towards a significant effect of group (F(1,25) = 3.79, p = .08), while the main effect of distractor was non significant (F(3, 75) = 1.53, p = .21).

Moreover, dyslexic participants exhibited normal oral motor skills, with no significant deficit in word repetition or rapid automatized naming (both: P >0.05) and a difference in pseudoword repetition accuracy showing a tendency towards significance ( P =0.08).

A positive trend was found between child and maternal reading engagement scores (p = 0.08).

While ZO1 mRNA expression was not modulated by any dietary intervention in the proximal jejunum and ileum, goats receiving N reduced feed showed a trend towards increased ZO1 mRNA expression in the mid jejunum ( P = 0.08).