Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

borderline significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
In separate models with log transformed adduct and metabolite values as the exposure variables, the direction and significance of the associations between adducts and outcomes were the same as the models with the dichotomized exposure with the exception of the CBCL DSM-oriented attention deficit hyperactivity scale raw score and CPRS DSM-IV Total scale raw score, which became borderline significant (p = 0.06, and p = 0.08, respectively) (data not shown).
marginal significancep = 0.061.2× alphagold
Conversely, TLR4 expression decreased dose-dependently with significantly more TLR4 expression seen in 1 ng/ml (p = 0.004) and with marginal significance at 5 ng/ml HMGB1-stimulation (p = 0.06) ( Figure 2E ). 3.5 HMGB1 induces Pp38 MAPK pathway To better understand the MAPK pathway activation by HMGB1, a semi quantitative assessment of phosphorylated (P) MAPK proteins was carried out.
marginally significantp = .061.2× alphagold
While there was a marginally significant correlation between the two outcome variables ( r = .32, p = .06), a sobel test [43] showed that the effect of social comparison (dummy coded as −2 for same-gender comparison, and +1 for opposite-gender and no comparison control) on visual self-representation was not mediated by explicit self-ratings, z = .84, p = .40.
a strong trendp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Correlation between mRNA Levels of Cytokines and ET-1 in Alveolar Macrophages and Clinical and Hemodynamic Parameters in HF Patients When investigating the correlations between mRNA levels of ET-1 and the cytokines that were up-regulated in alveolar macrophages from HF patients (i.e., TNFα and IL-6) and clinical and hemodynamic parameters in these patients, we found a strong trend toward correlation between IL-6 mRNA levels and LV function [LV ejection fraction (EF); r = −0.53, p = 0.06].
near-significantp = 0.061.2× alphagold
Relationships between macroalgal herbivory and other variables We found a near-significant logarithmic relationship between site averages for measurements of macroalgal herbivory and algal cover ( Fig. 4a ; F 1, 7 = 4.958; p = 0.06; r 2 = 0.415) but not between macroalgal herbivory and algal biomass (F 1, 7 = 3.26; r 2 = 0.318; p = 0.11).