Regarding Europe, the short-term effect of clean energy shocks on tourism appears weakly negative and marginally significant ( p = 0.06), possibly reflecting transitional frictions or sectoral inertia.
Excerpts
There was a marginally significant main effect for situation, F (1,94) = 3.636, p = .06, η 2 = .037 . .
For the Agg line, winning a territory increased mating success, while losing a territory was correlated with failure to mate, particularly with females from line 65 choosing (n = 27, P = 0.002) – this pattern is only borderline significant among females overall (n = 81, P = 0.06).
The analysis revealed a significant agency×context×ROI interaction for the first onset, (F(2,19) = 5.14, p<.05), and a marginally significant agency×context×ROI interaction for the second onset (F(2,19) = 3.85, p = .06).
The interaction between agency and context nearly reached significance (F(2,19) = 3.8, p<.06).
showed a trendp = 0.06
Myocardial T2 post-shock showed a trend to be higher than the individual pre-shock baselines (p = 0.06).
There was a marginally significant main effect for COMT, F (2,69) = 2.96, p = .06, partial Eta 2 = .09, no main effects for DAT, and a significant DAT x COMT interaction, F (2, 69) = 5.20, p = .008, partial Eta 2 = .14.
A marginally significant valence x time interaction was found, F (1,105) = 3.73, p = .06, partial η 2 = .03, indicating the decrease in response times across time points was greater for neutral valence conditions than positive valence conditions.
A 200% increase was also observed for claudin-7, though not quite statistically significant (P = 0.06; the lack of statistical significance [P>0.05] was likely due to the relatively small sample size [n = 3 cell layers], and the strong effect that a small sample size has on Student t test results).
CD4 + CD25 + Foxp3 + cells were also increased in the spleen and pancreatic lymph nodes of C-GFC mice when compared to standard chow mice, but these differences were borderline significant (p = 0.06 and 0.09 respectively).
a trend towards significancep = .06
There was a trend towards significance between groups in pre-treatment scores on the DASS-21 ( F 2, 128 = 2.83, p = .06), and no significant differences between CO, CL and Control groups in pre-treatment scores on the GAD-7, PSWQ, PDSS-SR, SIAS-6/SPS-6, PHQ-9 or SDS ( F 2, 128 range = .07 – .79, p range = .45 – .94).
However, the Mann-Whitney one-sided test p-value was at the cusp of significance (p-value = 0.06) for families defined using BLAST criterion.
The interaction between emotion and location was still marginally significant, F (2,13) = 3.141, p = 0.060.
From 5 dpi to 8 dpi, lesion scoring was 22.8 for the ID ASFV group and 17.3 for the ID AFSV+SGE group, while it declined to 12.0 for the TICK group (no result for the ID SGE group) and displayed an almost significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis χ2 = 5.4, df = 2, p = 0.06). 2.
The increase in the mean for the anger prompt compared to the fear prompt was not quite statistically significant ( p = .06).
showed a trendp = 0.06
The IL-12p40 levels only showed a trend to increase ( p = 0.06) when pericardial fluids were compared (pre- and post- CDCs administration) ( Fig 4A ).
did not quite reach significancep = 0.06
The level of knockdown was relatively modest and did not quite reach significance (p = 0.06), which may be due at least in part to variability in staining between brains.
sordidus ' regression slope in the Eastern Indo-Pacific, which was marginally significant ( P = 0.06), and the upper bound of this species' relationship in the Central Indo-Pacific ( P = 0.33).
of borderline significanceP = 0.06
Additionally, Mlh1 , and Sfrp1 which had shown age-related expression decrease of borderline significance (1.4 fold, P = 0.06) in the Mlh1 +/- WD* group ( Table S5 ) and is a well-known gene in CRC and Wnt signaling were studied for methylation.
close to significanceP = 0.06
(orchardgrass), associated with the control treatment, was close to significance (P = 0.06).
There was an almost significant interaction between sex and treatment (ANOVA, F 1.44 = 3.72, P = 0.06).
Yet, in our model, parrotfish density was marginally significant ( p = 0.06), the component of variance was minor and lower than other significant variables (3.9%), and no interactions were observed with taxa.
A marginally significant effect was found for the word frequency of T1, indicating that there is an overall long-lasting frequency effect (β = 0.073, p = 0.060) of T1.
showed a trendp = 0.06
Multivariate analysis revealed that mutation in KRAS and FGFR2 showed a trend (p = 0.06) towards longer and shorter DFS, respectively.
nearly reached significancep = 0.06
In our study, emotional abuse severity significantly related to psychiatric morbidity; and nearly reached significance with fatigue magnitude (p = 0.06) and reporting any pain interference (p = 0.057).