Excerpts

-13.55±12.48%, p = 0.04; Fig 2 ) and a statistical trend towards a postprocedural improvement in R t V global longitudinal strain (-8.24±6.25% vs. -13.47±7.61%, p = 0.06).

Interaction between both factors approached significance (p = 0.06).

When we defined the presence of a BCG scar strictly and excluded those with scar “unknown/not sure” and repeated the Cox regression (N = 4061), BCG scar and QFT were both only of borderline significance, hazard ratios 1.7 (95% CI 0.9–3.2, p = 0.06) and 1.7 (95% CI 1.0–2.9, p = 0.07) respectively while maternal education of primary school or less or unknown remained significant at hazard ratio 1.4 (95% CI 1.0–1.9, p = 0.04).

Ethanol treatment increased locomotor activity (two-way ANOVA: effect of treatment, F (1,36) = 4.67, p <0.05; Figure 6B ) and total arm entries in both groups, although the latter measure did not quite reach statistical significance ( p = 0.06; Figure 6C ).

Please remark how the continuous NRI achieved near significance (0.085; P = 0.06), providing further evidence of the value of OPN when estimating risk for the composite event.

An interaction term approached significance ( P = 0.06) in the full model, but the corresponding main effect of treatment was noticeably not associated in this modeling scenario ( P = 0.16).

PERMANOVA analysis of the overall suite of innate immune defenses detected significant differences between fallow deer and elk (p = 0.021) and fallow deer and sika (p = 0.021) and borderline significance between cervids and bovids (p = 0.06), but small sample sizes may have obfuscated other significant variation.

In the Benjamini-Hochberg FDR tests, all of the observed significant interactions were substantially reduced and we found borderline significant interactions for VDR rs1544410 ( Bsm1 , p = 0.06), rs731236 ( Taq1 , p = 0.06), rs7975232 ( Apa1 , p = 0.06) and AGT rs699 (p = 0.06).

The d′ results showed nearly significant or significant main effects of attractiveness, F (1, 34) = 3.68, p = .06, and distinctiveness, F (1, 34) = 7.00, p <.05.

By contrast, the PGLS regression of 90 var and Sensitivity ave remains significant at P = 0.029 ( Figure 4 ) and the PGLS regression of 90 var and Sensitivity max is near significance at P = 0.060.

IL-6 (but not CRP) was a marginally significant predictor ( P = 0.06) of GFDCAV at 5 years ( Table 3 ).

The main effect of color congruency was marginally significant [ F (1, 23) = 3.89, η p 2 = 0.15, p = 0.06].

After adjustments, the association of birth weight was rendered to a moderately significant trend (adjusted P -values<0.06), the association of birth length remained unaltered, and the association of head circumference became significant from a non-significant trend (adjusted P -values<0.05) ( Table 3 ).

Notably, scores for this subgroup were higher overall in the HOT compared to the CONTROL trial (main effect for trial approaching significance; p = 0.06), with moderate to large ES found between trials at baseline, 60, 90 and 120 min ( d = 0.83 [-0.17, 1.75] to 1.81 [0.64, 2.81]).

There was a marginally significant main effect for situation, F (1,94) = 3.636, p = .06, η 2 = .037 . .

Results Regression analysis performed on carpal tunnel length revealed FE angle ( p = 0.006) and RUD angle ( p < 0.001) to be significant factors, while the FE RUD interaction approached significance ( p = 0.06) with an overall model R 2 of 0.95.

This analysis did not evidence other significant effects, although the effect of PPI factor was near significance [F(2,56) = 2.95, p = .06].

Interestingly, when verbal ability was included in the models, the beta for the GET became nearly significant, β = .157, p = .060, whereas the beta for the ET became non-significant, β = .061, p = .508, revealing that, when verbal ability is controlled for, the GET is correlated with age whereas the ET is not.

Whilst no level of the modality attribute reached the 5% level of statistical significance, telephone-based provision was negative and of borderline significance (p = 0.06).

For colonization, the difference approached significance ( X 2 = 3.6, df = 1, p = 0.060).

As it was significant for 9 subjects and near significance (p = 0.06) for 2 subjects, the linear regression analysis can be considered reliable.

After vaccination, 12/17 (70.6%) subjects showed an increasing trend in the frequencies of Treg (from 0.74% to 1.2%; P = 0.06) with the median increase of 30% ( Fig. 4 ).

After vaccination, 12/17 subjects showed a trend of increased Treg frequency (P = 0.06) from 0.74% to 1.2%.

CitH3 was only significantly higher at baseline, day 2 and day 5 (p < 0.04) and just missed significance on day 1 (p = 0.06).

[38] published a review paper examining the relationship of Brassica vegetable consumption and prostate cancer risk and found that three of the six well-designed studies reported significant reduced risks (p<0.05) and one reported a borderline significance for reduced risk (p = 0.06) with high Brassica vegetable consumption.