Excerpts

Domestication status was borderline significant in explaining variation in alpha (p-value = 0.05) and beta diversity (p-value = 0.06) of rhizosphere bacterial communities from the field study (S6 Table in S1 File ).

Borderline significant differences between the BMI measurements across the TNM-stages is shown (p = 0.05).

When KH 2 PO 4 in the medium is replaced either by Ca 3 (PO 4 ) 2 or L - α -phosphatidylcholine, the increase in cyanobacterial cell density is quite significant ( P < 0.05, P < 0.01), and become more prominent with increase in inoculum density of strain JXJ CY 19 T (Tables 2 and 3 ).

Using those designs, most of the quadratic models obtained for each bacterium were highly significant, as is evident from high Model F-values and low p -values ( p <0.05) ( S4 Table ), confirming the adequacy of the model fits.

The difference in early-life fecundity was marginally significant ( F 1,37 = 3.98; p = 0.05).

As shown in Fig 6 , simvastatin induced a significant decrease in -HAD activity in the EDL Sim 60 and Sim 80 groups ( Fig 6C ), with a strong trend (p = 0.05, main effect) for a decrease in the PLT Sim 60 and Sim 80 groups ( Fig 6B ).

The three way interaction between job type, sex of face and image type was marginally insignificant (F(1, 118) = 3.91, p = 0.05, η p 2 = .03), which is not surprising given the reduced power of three-way interaction effects [ 29 ].

However, a two-way ANOVA with repeated measures showed only a marginally significant effect of Time (p = 0.05), but no Time*Treatment interaction (p = 0.19).

For glutamic acid + glutamine, there was an increasing trend in measured levels as dietary protein had increased, which led to P55 having the highest content in comparison to other treatment groups (p<0.05).

Comparison of population richness, as determined by the number of TRF peaks, identified highly significant differences between ponies and TP for each restriction enzyme (P<0.05) ( Table 1 ).

Initially, Hoxa1 B1 founders obtained fewer territories than controls leading to a marginally significant difference at the model intercept (GLMM; Z = 1.96, p = 0.050; S3 Table ).

The difference in genotypic distribution between POAG males and control male subjects was close to significance threshold (p = 0.050).

Analyses revealed only a marginally significant main effect of time on measures of vocal stability [F(1,17) = 4.43, p = 0.05].

• In GSEA, looks like the authors used both significant and weakly significant (p-value > 0.05) genes.

Marginally significant differences (p = 0.05) were observed between male cases and controls (217.52 vs. 298.17, respectively) but not within females ( Fig 1 ).

This was marginally significant in one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (F(2,28) = 4.9, p<0.05; n = 15, Fig 9G , lower part), however variability was high due to opposite (n = 2) or no (n = 3) response from 5 cells.

Only strains from Mallorca and Zaragoza showed a R ST value slightly significant ( P < 0.05).

The remaining pair-wise comparisons were either not or only marginally significant (P<0.05).

In the rostral regions, although all groups showed a trend for increased number of proliferating cells in the spinal cord, only the value for ChABC+GFs group reached the level of significance level (p<0.05, Fig. 3H ).

where P < 0.05 indicates statistical significance [...] was found to be slightly smaller than that of basal cells (−181 ± 21 pA, n = 7, P27–P30) but the difference was not quite significant (P = 0.05)” (PMID 18174213) “... resting activity of A5 neurons was marginally but not significantly higher in toxin-treated rats (0.9 ± 0.2vs. 1.8 ± 0.5 Hz, P = 0.068)” (PMID 22526887) “... significantly smaller than with fura-6F alone (P = 0.009), and slightly smaller than with fura-6F and EGTA (

It shows that both the bNt and non-bNt HIV MAbs have long CDR-H3s; the difference between these two MAb groups was only marginally significant ( Table 1A ; unadjusted p = 0.0501), and not significant compared to the Bonferroni corrected value of 0.0018.

These analyses revealed a marginally significant main effect of critical IOI on guessing rate (F(2,36) = 3.26, p = 0.0501, ƞ p 2 = 0.15); guessing rate was lower with longer critical IOIs ( Fig 3 ).

However, for the visual modality, an almost significant difference was observed between instructive expressions and novel metaphors ( p = .0501), with novel metaphors processed faster than instructive expressions.

If self- and non-self- reports were tested separately for the effect of study characteristics (one characteristic at a time), a significant effect was found only in self-reports for year when survey was conducted (k = 7, b = −0.1425±0.0519, P = 0.006) and a nearly significant effect was found again in self-reports for survey delivery method (k = 7, b = −1.2496±0.6382, P = 0.0502) Sensitivity analysis Self-report admission rates varied between 1.65% -following the removal of Kalichman and Friedman (1992) [35] - and 2.93% -following the removal of Martinson et al.

In disease-free survival analysis, low VHL expression had marginal significance ( P = 0.0502 by the log-rank test) but did not appear to be an independent predictor of the risk for chance of faster recurrence in a proportion hazards model.