Excerpts

The test for heterogeneity resulted in a highly significant outcome (Q = 40.53, df = 26, p < 0.05), confirming the existence of considerable heterogeneity among the studies.

Other nominally significant associations with INSIGF (P<0.05 and P BH >0.05) are reported in table S7 and in figure 3 .

In addition, rs13017599 in REL was associated (P = 0.03) although the result for this SNP in the whole AAD cohort was only marginally significant at P = 0.05.

Total body fat, android fat and gynoid fat were significantly decreased post-training in responders, although the decrease in android fat in non-responders was of borderline significance (P = 0.05).

Comparison of population richness, as determined by the number of TRF peaks, identified highly significant differences between ponies and TP for each restriction enzyme (P<0.05) ( Table 1 ).

There was a borderline significant result between age and the outcome variable (p = 0.05).

While this did not reach statistical significance, the parallel increase in CD8 + CD45RA − cells from 35% to 42% was significant (p<0.05).

Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) Enriched canonical pathways in CD105+ cells as revealed by IPA analysis IPA of common differentially expressed genes from CD105+ cells isolated from primary and metastatic RCC revealed highly significant overlap of a total of 335 canonical pathways with p value < 0.05.

cleared HCV were marginally significant ( P = 0.05), whereas differences between women with chronic HCV vs.

Vasopressor-free days showed a marginally significant difference between the low and usual dose groups [3(0–46) vs 3(0–50);p = 0.05].

Conversely, the direct effect of age on health was moderately significant (coeff = 0.040, p <0.05).

For LF-HRV there was a significant negative correlation with working memory accuracy in the during-tDCS task period (r = -0.50; p = 0.024), however, this association did not quite reach significance in the post-tDCS task period (r = -0.44; p = 0.050) – see Fig 5 .

6b and 6c ), both of which were highly significant (p<<0.05), explaining 64% of the variation in genotypic diversity among the 18 sites.

When we conditioned on rs2178403, three of the nine variants in the best model for PSMD2 remained nominally significant (p <0.05).

remission OR 17.8; [95% CI: 4–122]; P = 0.0005) correlated positively with the presence of vitamin D deficiency while the season of patient visit was close to significance (winter/spring vs . summer/fall OR 2.5; [95% CI: 1.0–6.8]; P = 0.05) The associations between vitamin D deficiency and active smoking, history of CD-related operations, mild and severe disease activity did not reach statistical significance ( Fig 3A ).

There was a significant trend for fewer singers during periods with higher received levels of seismic survey pulses at both MARU 1 ( p <0.05, effective degrees of freedom (edf) = 1) and MARU 2 ( p <0.01, edf = 1) ( Table 1 , Figure 4 ).

The difference is nearly significant (P = 0.05), indicating the MCP-1 may play a role in diet-induced macrophage adherence.

We also compared strain-specific nad5 Δ mtDNA transmission biases to starting nad5 Δ mtDNA levels at G0 ( Figure 4b ) and discovered a negative correlation between these two variables (Spearman rank correlation = −0.80) which was weakly significant ( P = 0.05).

This effect fell just short of statistical significance when investigated on between-state transitions ( P = 0.05 and P = 0.08 at 20°C and 30°C, respectively, Figure 3 , I).

The only SNP that was marginally significant in the meta-analysis was rs3219489 ( MUTYH Q338H), both under a recessive model (summary OR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17; p = 0.05) and assuming additive allelic effects (summary OR = 1.07, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.14; p = 0.06).

Although both trials showed a trend for higher oocyst intensities in A. funestus , the difference was not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney P >0.05).

Using those designs, most of the quadratic models obtained for each bacterium were highly significant, as is evident from high Model F-values and low p -values ( p <0.05) ( S4 Table ), confirming the adequacy of the model fits.

Results showed no significant relations between mothers’ prenatal socioeconomic or social support adversity and offspring’s parasympathetic nervous system trajectories, but there was a statistically significant relationship between social support adversity and offspring’s heart rate trajectories (p<.05) and a borderline significant relationship between socioeconomic adversity and offspring’s sympathetic nervous system trajectories (p = .05).

This was however of marginal significance (Fisher’s exact: P = 0.05).

Reproductive rate was negatively related to the effect of wetland amount on bird population abundance and the effect of reproductive rate was marginally significant (ES Z r = −0.25; 95% CI: −0.506, −0.001; p = 0.050) while the effect of body length was non-significant (ES Z r = 0.12; 95% CI: −0.056, 0.261; p = 0.205).