Regarding the self-report measures, we observed a marginally significant interaction Condition x Group, F(2) = 3.053, p = .05, partial ƞ 2 = .041, suggesting that, in both groups, the self-reported arousal was always higher in the fear condition compared with the neutral condition, as well as in the happy condition compared with the neutral condition, p < .01.
Excerpts
After adjustment for sex, BSA remained a significant correlate of LVEDID, LVEDL and LVEDV (p<0.01 for all), and also remained a borderline significant correlate of LV mass (p<0.05), but was no longer a correlate of LV end-diastolic external diameter.
Hispanic race was marginally significant ( p = 0.05).
While we estimated a nominally significant (p<0.05) p-value for only 9 of these overlapping SNVs, the SNVs whose estimated effects are in the same direction as previous literature have significance tests that are enriched for small p-values ( Figure 2A ).
Spearman rank correlation analysis shows that specifically in Alnus , Betula , Corylus , Fraxinus , Quercus and Plantago both temperature in the year prior to (T -1 ), as well as in the growing season (T), are highly significant factors (T April r s between 0.30 [P<0.05[ and 0.58 [P<0.0001]; T Juli-1 rs between 0.32 [P<0.05[ and 0.56 [P<0.0001]) in the annual pollen influx of wind-pollinated plants.
A marginally significant difference was observed between the WM and Primed conditions (t(18) = 2.104, p = .05) such that confidence ratings were slightly higher in response to WM items.
borderline significancep = 0.05
However, a decline was observed in MLANA levels (with borderline significance, p = 0.05).
Statistics Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann-Whitney nonparametric t test using GraphPad Prism 4 for Windows ( a p-value < 0.001 extremely significant; b p-value 0.001 to 0.01 very significant; c p-value 0.01 to 0.05 significant; p-value > 0.05 not significant).
As none of the results were significant after this correction at FDR < 0.20 and given the exploratory nature of this study, all results nominally significant at p < 0.05 were deemed of interest and discussed accordingly.
In the long-term assay, the pupation rate gradually decreased with the increase of pollen density; the decrease was marginally significant with control pollen ( F = 3.12, df = 17, P = 0.05), but was significant with both Cry1C pollen ( F = 6.58, df = 17, P = 0.004) and Cry2A pollen ( F = 6.77, df = 17, P = 0.004).
Two subscales did not reach statistical significance at the p<0.05 level at one-year follow-up vs. baseline: non-distracting: 3.37 vs 3.03, respectively; p = 0.09, emotional awareness: 3.45 vs 3.12, respectively; p = 0.16.
The association of AIx, cSBP and pSBP with MAU and mildly decreased GFR was highly significant in the first model, and held even after adjustment in the second and third models (P<0.05 for all); meanwhile, the association strength of MAU and mildly decreased GFR with cBP was similar to those with pBP in the first, second and third models.
marginally non-significantp = .05
In addition, we observed a marginally non-significant main effect of gender , F (1,115) = 3.84, MSE = 9.23, p = .05, ηp 2 = .032, with boys keeping a higher number of stickers ( M = 9.01, SE = 0.36) than girls ( M = 8.00, SE = 0.39; Fig 1B ).
LDSC analysis reveals five red blood cell indices genetically correlated with sepsis Our global genetic correlation analysis using LDSC (summarized in Table 1 ) identified nominally significant (LDSC P value < 0.05) correlation between sepsis and multiple blood cell phenotypes, including mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) (genetic correlation r g = 0.1286, P value = 0.0259), mean corpuscular volume (MCV) ( r g = 0.142, P value = 0.0094), mean reticulocyte volume (MRV) ( r g = 0.1181, P value = 0.0127), mean sphered corpuscular volume (MSCV) ( r g = 0.1242, P value = 0.0055), and red blood cell count (RBC) ( r g = −0.1084, P value = 0.0256).
This was marginally significant in one-way ANOVA with repeated measures (F(2,28) = 4.9, p<0.05; n = 15, Fig 9G , lower part), however variability was high due to opposite (n = 2) or no (n = 3) response from 5 cells.
In addition, performing tests on false positive and negative warnings using a slope F test based on the AICC (alertogram), shows that two years before the local minimum in 1987 was reached, the negative decrease towards a break becomes highly significant (p<<0.05) in terms of the estimated slopes ( Figure 5C ).
The differences in mean for the followups included subset were substantial ( F 4,94 = 4.437, p <.01), while the differences for the followups removed subset were borderline significant ( F 6,140 = 2.097, p ≈.05).
Resource Variation Over the Experiments In both ecosystems, TDP followed a decreasing trend over time (RM-ANOVA, effect time p<0.05, Table S1 ) with a steeper decline in the P-added treatments ( Figure 1A, B ) while concentration of TDN did not change (RM-ANOVA, time effect p-value>0.05).
In five studies with low-priority scale, the results showed that the sexual function of the participants in the nursing intervention group was better than that in the control group, and the differences were very close to statistical significance (SMD = −0.72, 95% CI = [−1.43–−0.00], P = 0.05) ( Fig 4B ). 3.4.2.
Then, associations between alcohol dependence and all nominally significant SNPs (p<0.05 in AAs) in PHF3-PTP4A1 were retested in EAs.
In the peri-infarcted zone, the percentage of apoptotic cells in groups ADSCs and Ex-ADSCs showed a decreasing trend compared with PBS group (131.5±19.3/mm 2 , 87.1±14.4/mm 2 vs. 178.3±26.4/mm 2 , p <0.05.
After accounting for competing mortality, there were borderline significant differences observed across the group of PGS _ FNBMD ldpred for MOF (p = 0.05), but not for HF (p = 0.71).
Major sites showed the highly significant ( p <0.05) effect of endogenous processes as determinants of the structure of crop productivity regulation ( Table S1 ).
The only marginally significant difference is observed for ER between GN and GL, with a P-value P = 0.05.
There was a borderline significant difference in FVC among the variants (p = 0.05), while no differences were seen in the other PFT values.