Excerpts

Two way ANOVA with repeated measures showed a significant effect of time (F = 9.49; p<0.001), a nearly significant interaction between time and drug (F = 1.49; p = 0.05), and no significant difference between the effects of E2 and G1 (F = 0.56; p = 0.65).

The main reasons of this bias were the lack of statistical testing or improper reporting of test results (63.3% of cases) and interpretation of marginally significant results (p < 0.05, p < 0.1 and p around 0.05) as indicators of effectiveness (10.1%).

Neither latitude (YCG) nor longitude (XCG) of northern shrimp distribution within the entire GOM showed a significant trend (linear regression, P>0.05, Fig 5 , data in S4 Fig ).

Response: We agree that the associations we observed in this study were nominally significant and did not survive the Bonferroni correction (corrected P > 0.05).

For bean residuals, there was only a borderline significant aggregate difference (χ 2 = 11.0, df = 5, and p = 0.05), and there were only three accompanying significant pairwise differences.

6 Apr 2021 Grammatical errors have been rectified Evidence of schistosomiasis as a social has been provided with a reference Evidence for recall bias in using traditional methods of expenditure and income in generating SES has been provided Repeated definition of acronyms has been eliminated A statement that STH and urine results were not reported in this paper has been added Results have been edited to enhance clarity in reporting 'infection prevalence' has been replaced with prevalence to eliminate redundancy 'marginal significance' has only been used where applicable to denote p-values>0.05 but <0.1 discussion, conclusion and limitation sections have been looked into and editing done Attachment Submitted filename: reviewer_comments.docx Click here for additional data file.

Comparing differences between both techniques, ΔCV 3mo of the 3, 5, and 7 mm diameter regions (P = .001 respectively) and ΔCV 12mo of the 5 and 7 mm diameter zones (P < .05) approached significance, as well as ΔCT 3mo and ΔCT 12mo for the central and 2, 4, and 6 mm diameter areas (P < .05).

The correlation between GLS measurements and the presence of grade ≥2 AR was borderline significant (r = 0.29, P = 0.05).

The hardness of EG formulated CFS remained constant over the storage period (p>0.05), while an increasing trend in hardness was found in the control (p<0.05) ( Fig 2D ).

At the allelic level, a marginally significant difference was observed in the frequency of 5 and 6 alleles among HADS-A subgroups ( p = 0.05).

Domestication status was borderline significant in explaining variation in alpha (p-value = 0.05) and beta diversity (p-value = 0.06) of rhizosphere bacterial communities from the field study (S6 Table in S1 File ).

Fat intake from fast food has an almost significant evidence showing its association with prehypertension (RR = 3.15, 95% CI 0.98 to 10.17; P = 0.05).

Competence had a very small positive but somewhat statistically significant ( p ≤ .05) effect on perceiving the interview less time consuming (.08*).

In adjusted multivariable analysis, though, daily fruits and vegetable consumption narrowly missed statistical significance (p = 0.05), the finding is still of clinical relevance.

At a group level, there was a marginally significant difference between the mean horizontal positions for left vs right cues ( t = 2.15, p < 0.05), but the overall evidence was not compelling ( l o g 10 B F 10 = 0.19).

The NPP for 31–50-year-old stands was 0.78 ± 0.24 kgC m -2 year -1 and exhibited a decreasing trend with stand age ( p <0.05; Fig 8A ).

Eleven out of the 16 SNPs in this genomic area are nominally significant (10 −6 <p<.05) providing additional support for the involvement of EFNA5 in AD.

Besides, the results of repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant trend in VAS through the study (F = 44.603, P< 0.05) and the two groups had significantly different trends (F = 68.566.

There was a main effect of speed on the rate of activity counts per minute ( F = 439.42, p <0.01, η p 2 = 0.88) and a nearly significant main effect of group ( F = 4.02, p = 0.05, η p 2 = 0.07).

Concerning the central aspect of fatigue, the SMM did not induce change in %VA for PF ( P = 0.73), but a decreasing trend was observed for KE (−2.18±2.96%, P = 0.05, d = 0.96).

Gene-based analyses indicated three genes with nominally significant p-values (uncorrected p < 0.05) across multiple cohorts: GALC , SEC23IP and PARP9 .

One-way Anova analysis showed that intramuscular treatments effected the number of regenerating fibers by a quasi-significant level after one week of regeneration (df:3,19; F = 3.137, p = 0.05).

Regardless of the Bonferroni correction, the term “nominally significant” refers to genes with Fisher’s exact test P values ≤ 0.05.

Inattention After controlling for the covariates of ethnicity and age, analysis of omission errors showed no significant effect of Time ( F (1, 132) = 3.44, p = .066, ηp 2 = .025), TRP ( F (2, 132) = .2.02, p = .137, ηp 2 = .030) or Group ( F (2, 132) = 3.75, p = .055, ηp 2 = .028), although arguably the latter could be considered a trend towards significance with the Control group producing fewer errors than both ADHD groups ( p < 0.05) as demonstrated by contrast analysis.

There was a statistically significant moderate positive correlation between total brain volume (%ICV) and EZ-RPE volume in PD group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.482, P = .04), normal cognition control group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.514, P < .01) and a marginally significant moderate positive correlation in AD dementia group (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.526, P = .05) ( Fig 3 ).