Excerpts

coli detection on ED attendances is only marginally statistically significant, and thus the null hypothesis for this outcome cannot be rejected at the conventional significance level of p<0.05.

Importantly in CONV mice ileal TNF-α showed strong and highly significant correlation with plasma insulin and plasma glucose (R values: insulin = 0.89, P <0.05; glucose = 0.93, P <0.05) at the 16-week time point ( Table 5 ), and this was a particularly strong correlation.

Note that for the reading aloud tasks in 5th and 11th graders, ‘80s and ‘90s were almost significantly different (z = 1.96, p = .05), probably due to number words lengths (i.e. 87:“quatrevingtsept” vs 97: “quatrevingdixtsept”).

We also observed a marginally significant interaction between the training group and concreteness ( b = 1.47, t (3949) = 1.98, p = .05; d = .06).

The only association that approached significance (p = 0.050) suggested a decrease in soreness scores (i.e., increased perceptual feelings of soreness) was associated with a small reduction in Countermovement Depth ( r = 0.16).

An ANOVA with consistency and pronoun type as within-subjects factors revealed a marginally significant main effect of pronoun type ( F (1,31) = 4.12, p = 0.05, MSE = 32.03), and the percentage of correct responses for Nin was lower than that for Ni (93.13% vs. 95.16%).

A silent polymorphism in GLUT4 , rs5435, showed a slight trend towards association (P = 0.05).

The difference to the private condition was marginally significant ( t (60) = 1.98, p = .05, 95% [-0.01, 1.15], d = 0.254).

Among these results, we also report a near-significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis test, W = 5.96, df = 2, P = 0.05) in the maximum crown diameter of the trees between the three genetic clusters when analyzing forest variables only.

While none of the predictor variables were statistically significant in 2012, moon and date were marginally significant (0.10 < p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ).

The differences in mean for the followups included subset were substantial ( F 4,94 = 4.437, p <.01), while the differences for the followups removed subset were borderline significant ( F 6,140 = 2.097, p ≈.05).

Furthermore, there was a decreasing trend of AST in T2DM with DR (21.5 ± 8.8 U/L vs. 23.9 ± 18.7 U/L, p > 0.05) and T2DM with nephropathy (21.5 ± 9.9 U/L vs. 23.9 ± 18.7 U/L, p > 0.05) compared to T2DM patients without either of them, despite the nonsignificant results [ 10 ].

According to Table 1 , in this model the variables sailing date, crystal type, cloudiness dominance m dominance , navigation periodicity Δ t and night sailing are highly significant ( p < 0.05), while the cloudiness changeability σ changeability is not significant.

Out of 576 possible specifications, 192 comprised more than a single study, yielding 135 (70.4%) nominally significant ( p < .05) negative summary effects.

We also investigated if the Hp-Hb peak correlated with age and indeed observed that only age was close to being statistically significant (p = 0.05) in a linear regression model that included the participant groups and the square root of the Fe-peak areas corresponding to the Hp-Hb complex.

Borderline significant differences between the BMI measurements across the TNM-stages is shown (p = 0.05).

Indirect effects on vaccine rejection from age, identification as white or evangelical, ideology and same-party friends fall just short of significance (all 0.10 > p > 0.05).

When determining the ratio of HRE-dependent firefly luciferase activity over the activity of the constitutively expressed Renilla luciferase, the inhibitory effects of mitomycin C, YC-1 and camptothecin were still highly significant ( Fig. 1c , lower panel, p <0.05).

P300 response (500–600 ms) The ANOVA performed on the P300 amplitude values, measured between 500 and 600 ms over the anterior-frontal sites (AFF1, AFF2, AFZ, FZ and FCZ) showed a borderline significant main effect of condition (F (2, 68) = 3.14, p = 0.05; η p 2 = 0.08), indicating that the P300 amplitude recorded in response to Congruent terminal words (4.18 μV, SE = 0.51) was overall greater (p = 0.015) than the one measured in response to Neutral terminal words (3.41 μV, SE = 0.53).

The average difference of predictability between these two populations was a highly significant 0.10 (0.08 standard deviation, Wilcoxon sign-rank test p<0.05).

The results showed highly significant activity of Eug-NE and Eug against hydatid PCs compared to ABZ ( P < 0.05).

With Leuppi 2013 included, the mean difference is marginally significant at -0.91 days (95% CI = -1.81–-0.02 days, p = 0.05).

All the results were highly significant p-value < 0.05.

For TT response, a highly significant positive linear influence of extraction temperature (p<0 . 05) as well as sample-to-solvent ratio (p<0 . 001) was recorded.

Immunohistochemistry technique showed that EGFR vIII is highly expressed in benign tumors as compared to the atypical meningioma with a highly significant p-value (p<0.05).