Barely Significant

Excerpts

33,758 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = .020.4× alphagold
In contrast, the Semantic-Other condition revealed a marginally significant difference from baseline performance for tapping [ t (39) = 2.50, p = .02, d = .79] and a significant difference from baseline performance for word production [ t (39) = 3.83, p <.0001, d = 1.23], indicating a reduction in both finger tapping and word production performance in this condition.
marginally significantP = 0.020.4× alphagold
The difference between groups GV (87%) and V (53%) was marginally significant (corrected α = 0.017, Z = 1.99, P = 0.02), though the difference between groups G (67%) and V (53%) was non-significant ( Z = 0.74, P = 0.23), and the difference between groups GV (87%) and G (67%) was not significant either ( Z = 1.29, P = 0.09).
a significant trendP = 0.020.4× alphagold
When different types of dairy consumption were investigated separately for CVD, CHD, fracture, or all-cause mortality events, a significant trend of lower risk of fracture with increasing total fermented dairy consumption (adjusted model P = 0.02) was observed, with HR of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.50–0.90) for the highest (total fermented dairy>133 g/week) vs lowest (0≤total fermented dairy≤26, g/week) quartiles of total fermented dairy consumption ( Table 3 ).
highly significantP-value = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
We found that the degree distribution of the subpathway nodes of the actual DMSPN was significantly broader than that of the random networks (P-value<10e–10, see SI Figure S2A ), whereas the distribution of disease nodes did not display such a highly significant difference (P-value = 0.02, see SI Figure S2B ), suggesting that the different subpathways in the DMSPN possessed the considerable differences with respect to causing diseases.
showed a trendp = 0.020.4× alpha
Another study [ 37 ] used a complex intervention consisting of health professional and patient education (written information, family history collection proforma), documentation (EMR documentation of referral for GC/GT and testing protocol pathway) and systems (scheduling GC appointments directly at gynaecology clinic) showed a trend towards the intervention for GC referral (+27.4 (95% CI 11.1–43.7) p = 0.02) and completion of GT (+20.6 (95% CI 5.9–35.4) and towards the control for completion of GC (-27.8 (95% CI -46.7 to -9.1)) and identifying hereditary cancer (- 17.9 (95% CI– 40.9–5.1) p = 0.17).
marginally significantP = 0.020.4× alphagold
Individuals who consumed more coffee presented marginally significant more RA of Fusobacteria ( P = 0.02, FDR = 0.20) in their gut microbiota compared to those reporting low or no coffee intake, but the RA of Fusobacteria was significantly higher in smokers compared to non-smokers ( P = 0.009, FDR = 0.027).
a significant trendp = 0.020.4× alphagold
When dividing IgM anti-PC levels into quartiles, there was a significant trend across the quartiles for the presence of multi-vessel disease with decreased levels of IgM anti-PC (p = 0.02), identifying a threshold for IgM anti-PC at the 25 percentiles, 24.6 U/ml, thus IgM anti-PC were divided into high and low levels at the 25 percentiles.
borderline significancep = 0.020.4× alpha
Pimecrolimus treatment increased the externalization of both CD203c and CD193 on the surface of cells isolated from hymenopteran venom allergics (but not healthy controls) following stimulation with high doses of venom (1.0 μg*ml -1 ), leading to a 4.3–6.6% increase in the frequency of SSC low CD203c + CD193 + , SSC low CD203c + and SSC low CD193 + cells (borderline significance—paired t -test p = 0.02, = 0.08 and = 0.02, respectively).
modestly significantP = 0.020.4× alphaqualifiedgold
Previously, the UGT1A7*3 allele exhibited modestly significant association with colorectal cancer (OR = 2.39; P = 0.02) [ 57 ], lung cancer [ 62 ], endometrial cancer [ 63 ] and pancreatic cancer (OR = 1.98; P = 0.003) [ 64 ] with a particularly strong association in smokers with pancreatic carcinoma who were younger than 55 years (OR = 4.7; P = 0.0009), suggesting the magnitude of the observed associations may be modified by environmental interactions.