Excerpts

In other datasets, all other comparisons with the first in-vivo pipeline showed differences that were significant, or bordered on significance (HCP-M in-vivo repeat, p = 0.01; HCP-M synthetic, p = 0.06; Hospital synthetic, p = 0.08), but these median differences (0.33%, 0.24%, and 0.78% respectively) were again well below inter-group and longitudinal differences of clinical or scientific significance [E.g. 4 , 48 ]. 4.3 Comparison of Freesurfer labels Table 4 shows generalised Dice similarity coefficients for 70 cortical grey matter labels, or 16 deep grey-matter labels.

Brucellosis herd transmission risk score Univariable ordinal analyses showed highly significant associations between the brucellosis herd transmission risk score with District and ‘Heard about human brucellosis’ (both P < 0.01).

Highly significant (P<0.01) mean squares (Group MS) were recorded across genotypes for the parameters, calli induction, green plant regeneration, total regeneration, number of shoots/ plant and albino produced.

As can be seen from Panel E-H, LCAD expression was lower in the MS-S-N group than in the SD-S-N group; in contrast to the MS-S-N group, LCAD mRNA expression in the MS-S-I ( P < 0.05) and MS-E-I ( P < 0.01) groups showed a trend of increasing; in the MS-E-I group, LCAD protein expression was significantly increased ( P < 0.01), and in the MS-E-I group, LCAD protein expression was significantly higher ( P < 0.05) than in the MS-E-N group.

This response was somewhat attenuated at the highest concentration of 50 ng/mL, though still highly significant (P<.01) for the uninfected mucosa.

** Highly significant (p<0.01), *** Very highly significant (p<0.001). a = anterior, an = animal, d = dorsal, l = left, n = number, p = posterior, r = right, v = ventral, veg = vegetal.

German terms continue to exhibit a positive trend during WWII (r = 0.79, p<0.01).

Fixation indices that indicate genetic differentiation, including F CT (between groups), F SC (among populations within groups) and F ST (within populations) were all highly significant ( P <0.01) for the three mtDNA genes ( Table 2 ).

Additionally, a moderately significant positive correlation was found between the proportion of whole grains and TIR (Est. = 12.19, p = 0.01, Table 4 ).

Performance of 1,5-Anhydrosorbitol alone was 0.58 and improvement to an AUC of 0.71 when all metabolites of the signature were included was highly significant (p-value<0.01, Figure S1 ).

The coefficient (−0.60) of the error correction term E C T t − 1 is negative and highly significant (p < 0.01) ( Table 5 ).

The results showed that egg weight had a highly significant (P < 0.01) correlation with albumen weight and a significant positive correlation (P < 0.05) with yolk weight in Potchefstroom Koekoek.

S = 96.99 − 2.77 A + 2.51 B − 0.87 C + 1.08 A B − 0.86 A C + 1.15 B C − 1.17 A 2 − 0.59 B 2 − 1.46 C 2 (17) D = 5.30 − 0.39 A + 1.00 B − 2.52 C + 0.25 A B − 0.040 A C + 0.47 B C − 1.09 A 2 − 0.26 B 2 + 0.79 C 2 (18) Table 3 shows that the two regression models were highly significant ( P < 0.01), and the fitting degrees of the regression equations were high ( P > 0.05).

This difference is highly significant for a one-way ANOVA test ( F (1, 97) = 13.79, p < .01).

Interestingly, the PCV2-positive rate was significantly higher in the PPV7-positive samples than in the non-PPV7 samples, and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.01).

Influence of nitrogen fertilizer on the bulb quality of onion varieties The analysis of variance revealed that the main effects, as well as the two-way interaction effects of variety and nitrogen, had highly significant ( p<0 . 01 ) effects on the solid soluble content of onion bulbs.

In line with our third hypothesis (H3), the coefficient for Int_D is positive (β = 4.919), and highly significant (p < .01), suggesting a favorable relationship between the presence of international directors and a company’s investments in pollution reduction.

Individually five out of six birds' performance reached significance within 15 trials (binomial test, p value <0.001), the remaining bird (R) approached significance at 20 trials (binomial test, p = 0.01, ns with a Bonferroni adjusted alpha level of 0.007).

Significant differences were assumed at P<0.05 (*) and highly significant differences at P<0.01 (**).

‘*’and ‘**’ represent significant difference ( P ≤ 0.05) and extremely significant difference ( P ≤ 0.01), respectively.

Characterization of multi-flowering genotypes The analysis of variance among nine garden pea genotypes showed highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.01) for all the 14 traits studied ( S2 Table ), indicating a high genetic variability among the genotypes.

A Pearson correlation analysis revealed a highly significant negative correlation between the amount of dissolved P and the pH (r = -0.925**, p <0.01).

The combined prevalence of overweight and obesity in most age subgroups showed an increasing trend over time ( p <0.01 for trend test across survey year).

When we compared invasive rat activity in pre- and post-COVID lockdown conditions, we found the decrease in Rattus activity to be highly significant (p < 0.01).

lnCatalase was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.081, p < .001), but the associated p value from the multivariate test was only marginally significant at .051. lnUreA was associated with worse Reasoning (b = -.059, p < .01); the p value from the associated multivariate test was .049.