Barely Significant

Excerpts

4,910 sentences · 1 filter applied

marginally significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
In the crude model, the inactive health-related behavior class was significantly associated with greater levels of IL-6 ( β = 0.187, SE (standard error) = 0.069, p = 0.007) and cMetS ( β = 0.921, SE = 0.392, p = 0.020), whereas the positive association between the inactive health-related behavior class and hs-CRP ( β = 0.228, SE = 0.124) were marginally significant ( p = 0.067).
marginally significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
In contrast to the TT group, there was a significant difference in vitamin C intake ( p = 0.012) and a marginally significant difference in α-tocopherol intake ( p = 0.067) between the groups: the CKD group consumed more vitamin C and α-tocopherol than the non-CKD group.
borderline significantp = 0.0671.3× alphagold
Interaction between Sex and the CUN-BAE Index When we assessed the interaction of potential modifying effect of sex by the CUN-BAE index in the fully-adjusted models, we did find a statistically significant interaction when considering quartiles of the CUN-BAE index ( p = 0.0017), although for z-BF the interaction was borderline significant ( p = 0.067). 3.4.
showed a trendp = 0.06721.3× alpha
Pnpla2 showed a trend toward a phase × exercise interaction (F(1, 25) = 3.67, p = 0.0672, partial η 2 = 0.13), with post hoc analysis indicating significantly lower expression in ZT3-exe than in ZT15-exe (mean difference = −0.67, t(25) = 2.78, 95% CI [−1.17, −0.17], p = 0.0105, Hedges’ g = 1.08), and lower levels in ZT15-sed than in ZT15-exe mice (mean difference = −0.51, t(25) = 2.03, 95% CI [−1.03, −0.01], p = 0.0521, Hedges’ g = 0.79); however, this interaction did not remain significant after FDR correction.
borderline significantp = 0.0681.4× alphagold
There was a significant time by treatment interaction on IDA ( p = 0.028) and a borderline significant time by treatment interaction on ID with or without anemia ( p = 0.068).
a notable trendp = 0.0681.4× alphagold
Further, while there were no statistically significant between group differences in change from baseline to 3-months for blood pressure or BMI, there was a notable trend for BMI to remain lower in the MKNA group (mean change of −0.82), compared to the MKNE group (mean change of 0.26; t (47) = −1.87, p = 0.068).
borderline significantp -value = 0.0681.4× alphagold
Pilot Study The change in BMI z-score of children in the intervention group was −0.16 ( p -value = 0.002), while in the control group, BMI z-score decreased by −0.21 (borderline significant, p -value = 0.068), but between groups, there was no statistically significant difference.